ACCA Applied Knowledge · Management Accounting · Alternative cost accounting principles
Which of the following is most likely to make ABC more suitable than traditional absorption costing for an organisation?
ABC is most suitable when overheads are large and products consume support activities such as set-ups and inspections in very different proportions. Volume-based absorption would then distort product costs, whereas ABC traces costs to the activities that cause them.
- AOverheads are a small proportion of total costs and products consume resources in similar proportions
- BThe organisation makes a single product in a single process
- COverheads are large and products differ widely in their use of support activities such as set-ups and inspectionsCorrect
- DCosts are mostly direct materials that vary with output
Explanation
ABC adds most value where overheads are significant and products consume activities in different proportions, since volume-based absorption then distorts product costs. The other situations involve low overheads, single products or direct costs, where ABC gives little extra accuracy for its added cost.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Alternative cost accounting principles shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Alternative cost accounting principles questions
- Zeta Co produced 12,000 units and sold 13,500 units in a period. Fixed production overhead is budgeted at $96,000 for a normal output of 12,…
- Which of the following best describes a cost driver in activity based costing?
- Which of the following is a recognised criticism or limitation of activity based costing?
- A product sells for $50 per unit and uses materials costing $20 per unit. Labour and overhead (factory cost) total $300,000 per period. The …
- Harlow Co makes products X and Y. Overheads are $240,000 and are currently absorbed on direct labour hours: X uses 6,000 hours and Y uses 4,…
- In a period, absorption costing profit was $5,000 lower than marginal costing profit. The fixed overhead absorption rate was $4 per unit and…