CSEET · Business Laws and Management · Elements of Law relating to Negotiable Instruments
Which of the following is NOT an essential requirement for a person to be a holder in due course of a promissory note payable to order?
Receiving the instrument directly from the maker is not required. A holder in due course needs consideration, must become payee or indorsee before maturity, and must have no sufficient cause to believe the transferor's title was defective.
- AHe became the payee or indorsee for consideration
- BHe became the payee or indorsee before the amount became payable
- CHe had no sufficient cause to believe any defect existed in the title of the transferor
- DHe must have received the instrument directly from the makerCorrect
Explanation
Section 9 requires consideration, becoming payee or indorsee of an order instrument, acquiring before maturity, and no sufficient cause to believe in a title defect. There is no requirement to receive it directly from the maker; an indorsee from an intermediate party can qualify.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Elements of Law relating to Negotiable Instruments shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Elements of Law relating to Negotiable Instruments questions
- Consider these statements about Section 20 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. I. The paper must be stamped in accordance with the law …
- As regards its territorial extent, the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 extends to:
- Ravi signs and delivers to Sunil a paper that is duly stamped under the law relating to negotiable instruments and is wholly blank. Under th…
- Consider the statements about instruments made payable to order or to bearer. Statement I: An instrument expressed to be payable to a partic…
- A bearer cheque is indorsed by Sunil with the words "Pay Kavita." and delivered to Kavita. According to the illustrations to Section 50 of t…
- A promissory note was obtained from its maker, Karan, by means of fraud. Mehta now holds it and sues Karan. Under the presumptions in the Ac…