CS Professional · Goods and Services Tax (GST) and Corporate Tax Planning · Supply under GST
Which of the following persons is NOT deemed to be 'related persons' merely by the stated fact, as per the Explanation to Section 15?
Two companies in which an unconnected investor holds only 10% voting shares each are not deemed related. The Explanation requires holding of twenty-five per cent or more of voting stock in both. Legal partners, employer and employee, and family members are expressly deemed related persons.
- ATwo persons who are legally recognised partners in business
- BAn employer and its employee
- CTwo persons who are members of the same family
- DTwo companies, where an unconnected investor holds 10% voting shares in each and no other link existsCorrect
Explanation
The deeming rule for shareholding applies where a person owns, controls or holds twenty-five per cent or more of the voting stock or shares of both. A 10% holding is below the threshold. Partners, employer-employee and family members are expressly listed as related.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Supply under GST shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Supply under GST questions
- A supplier of taxable goods issues a tax invoice for Rs 80,000 and receives Rs 80,700 from the recipient. Under the proviso to Section 12(2)…
- Under Section 8 of the CGST Act, 2017, a mixed supply comprising two or more supplies is treated as a supply of which of the following?
- Under section 13 of the CGST Act, 2017, which of the following is the time of supply of services in the normal case where the supplier issue…
- Section 7(1A) of the CGST Act, 2017 states that where certain activities or transactions constitute a supply under section 7(1), they shall …
- Tara Fabrics Ltd. sells garments to an unrelated buyer for ₹50,000 and separately charges ₹2,000 as packing charges on the same invoice, bef…
- Under section 10 of the CGST Act, 2017, which of the following registered persons is NOT eligible to opt for the composition levy under sub-…