NISM Certifications · NISM-Series-V-A: Mutual Fund Distributors · Mutual Fund Scheme Performance
Which of the following statements about comparing a mutual fund scheme's performance with its benchmark is correct?
A benchmark should match the scheme's investment objective and asset mix. Only then does comparing returns show whether the fund manager added value. A mismatched index, a very short period, or skipping the benchmark for debt funds would give misleading conclusions.
- AThe benchmark should be chosen to match the scheme's investment objective and asset mixCorrect
- BAny broad equity index may be used for every scheme
- CA scheme beating its benchmark in a single month proves superior management
- DBenchmark comparison is unnecessary for debt schemes
Explanation
Performance is meaningful only against a benchmark consistent with the scheme's mandate, such as a large-cap index for a large-cap fund. Using a mismatched index distorts the comparison. One month is too short to judge skill, and debt schemes also have benchmarks.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Mutual Fund Scheme Performance shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Mutual Fund Scheme Performance questions
- An investor put Rs 1,00,000 in a growth scheme, and after exactly 2 years the investment was worth Rs 1,44,000 with no interim cash flows. W…
- A fund's portfolio turnover ratio is high. What is the most direct implication for investors?
- A scheme's NAV grew from Rs 10.00 to Rs 12.10 over two years with no dividends. What is the compounded annual growth rate (CAGR)?
- A scheme returned 14% over a year while its benchmark returned 11% over the same period. Which statement about this scheme is correct?
- A scheme gave a return of 16% with a standard deviation of 8%. The risk-free rate is 6%. What is the Sharpe ratio?
- An investor put Rs 1,00,000 in a scheme and the investment grew to Rs 1,44,000 after exactly 2 years, with no interim payouts. What is the c…