IAI Actuarial Core Principles · Economic Modelling · Stochastic models for security prices
Which statement about a mean-reverting Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model for an interest rate dr = a(mu - r)dt + sigma dW (a > 0) is correct?
The long-run distribution is normal with mean mu and variance sigma squared over two a. The process is Gaussian so it can go negative, and its expectation drifts from the starting value towards mu.
- AThe long-run variance of r grows without bound
- Br is always positive
- CThe long-run distribution of r is normal with mean mu and variance sigma^2/(2a)Correct
- DThe long-run variance is sigma^2/a
- Expected value of r equals r0 at all times
Explanation
The stationary distribution of the OU process is normal with mean mu and variance sigma^2/(2a). Variance does not grow without bound, and r can be negative because it is Gaussian. The expected value moves from r0 towards mu.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Stochastic models for security prices shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Stochastic models for security prices questions
- A share pays no dividends and trades at Rs 200. The continuously compounded risk-free rate is 6% per year. A European call and put on it bot…
- Which is a recognised limitation of modelling an equity index with GBM with constant μ and σ?
- A share price follows GBM with μ = 12% p.a. and σ = 20% p.a. What is the expected value of ln(S(t)/S(0)) over one year, i.e. the mean of the…
- For a standard Brownian motion W(t), what is Var[W(9) − W(4)]?
- A stock price S(t) follows geometric Brownian motion dS = μS dt + σS dW. Which statement about the process is correct?
- In the Black-Scholes framework for a non-dividend-paying share, the share price S_t is assumed to follow geometric Brownian motion. Which st…