IAI Actuarial Core Principles · Economic Modelling · Rational choice theory and utility
Which statement about the von Neumann-Morgenstern axioms and expected utility is correct?
Expected utility rankings are unchanged by a positive linear transformation of the utility function, so utility is unique only up to scale and origin. The axioms do not force risk neutrality or concavity; those reflect individual risk attitudes.
- AUtility functions are unique, so any change in scale alters the ranking of gambles
- BPreferences consistent with the axioms are unchanged by a positive linear transformation of the utility functionCorrect
- CExpected utility requires every investor to be risk neutral
- DCompleteness means an investor must prefer riskier gambles
- Transitivity implies utility must be a concave function
Explanation
Expected utility rankings are preserved under U* = aU + b with a > 0, so utility is defined only up to a positive linear transformation. The other statements confuse axioms with risk attitudes; concavity reflects risk aversion, not transitivity.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Rational choice theory and utility shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Rational choice theory and utility questions
- An investor has utility U(w) = -e^(-0.0002w). Her absolute risk aversion A(w) = -U''(w)/U'(w) is what?
- Which feature of a utility function U(w) implies that an investor is risk averse under expected utility theory?
- In prospect theory, as proposed by Kahneman and Tversky, outcomes are evaluated mainly as gains or losses relative to a reference point. Whi…
- Which observation is most directly a challenge to expected utility theory's independence axiom, as shown by the Allais paradox?
- An individual has utility U(w) = ln(w) and faces a 50:50 gamble giving final wealth of Rs 4,00,000 or Rs 1,00,000. What is the certainty equ…
- In the Kahneman-Tversky framing experiments, people choose a certain gain over a gamble with the same expected value, yet choose a gamble ov…