ACCA Strategic Professional · Advanced Financial Management · Valuation and the use of free cash flows
Which statement best describes a key weakness of valuing a company using the net asset (asset-based) method compared with a free cash flow valuation?
The main weakness is that the net asset method ignores future cash generation and unrecorded intangibles such as brands and know-how. It values what the company owns rather than what it earns, whereas free cash flow valuation captures expected cash flows.
- AIt ignores the value of future cash generation and internally generated intangibles not on the statement of financial positionCorrect
- BIt requires an estimate of the cost of capital that is difficult to obtain
- CIt cannot be used for companies that pay no dividends
- DIt always produces a value higher than free cash flow valuation
Explanation
Asset-based values reflect assets less liabilities, often at book or break-up values, so earnings power, brands and other unrecognised intangibles are missed. It does not need a cost of capital and does not depend on dividends. It is not always higher.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Valuation and the use of free cash flows shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Valuation and the use of free cash flows questions
- Brava Co has 10 million shares in issue and expected earnings of $5m. A similar listed company has a P/E ratio of 12. Brava is unlisted and …
- Carvel plc expects free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) of $12.0 million next year, growing at 4% a year indefinitely. Its WACC is 10%. Using t…
- Which discount rate is appropriate when valuing a company's equity by discounting its free cash flow to equity (FCFE)?
- Zeta Co has equity market value of $600m and net debt of $200m. It reports earnings before interest and tax of $80m and its sector peers tra…
- When valuing a company using FCFF, which cash flow treatment is correct?
- A company pays low dividends but generates large FCFE. Why might an analyst prefer an FCFE valuation to a dividend valuation model?