CMA Final · Risk Management in Banking and Insurance · Structure and Type of Re-insurance
Which statement best describes facultative reinsurance as distinct from treaty reinsurance?
Facultative reinsurance is placed individually for each risk, and the reinsurer can accept or refuse it. In a treaty, the reinsurer is obliged to take all business falling within the agreed terms. Facultative cover can be proportional or non-proportional.
- AThe insurer and reinsurer agree on each individual risk separately, and the reinsurer may accept or decline itCorrect
- BThe reinsurer must accept all risks within the agreed class automatically
- CIt can only be written on a proportional basis
- DIt is arranged only after a loss has occurred
Explanation
Facultative reinsurance is negotiated risk by risk, so the reinsurer has freedom to accept or reject. Treaty reinsurance binds the reinsurer to accept all business within the agreed terms. Facultative cover can be proportional or non-proportional, and it is placed before the risk attaches.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Structure and Type of Re-insurance shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Structure and Type of Re-insurance questions
- In a surplus (proportional) treaty of reinsurance, how is the reinsurer's share of premium and claims on each ceded risk determined?
- Under Section 6B of the Insurance Act, 1938, a scheme to bring an insurer's capital structure into conformity with section 6A is sanctioned …
- Which statement about facultative reinsurance is correct?
- A surplus treaty has a retention line of Rs 2 crore and the insurer cedes the excess over its retention to the reinsurer. For a risk with su…
- Himalaya Insurance has an excess of loss treaty covering Rs 8 crore in excess of Rs 2 crore retention per risk, applied to each risk separat…
- Under a quota share treaty, a reinsurer accepts 40% of every policy written by the cedant, in return for 40% of the premium and 40% of the l…