CS Executive · Jurisprudence, Interpretation and General Laws · Law relating to Information Technology
Which statement correctly describes how the Information Technology Act, 2000 came into force, according to Section 1?
The Act came into force on a date the Central Government appointed by notification, and different dates may be appointed for different provisions. A reference to commencement in a provision is read as commencement of that provision. It was not tied to assent or State notifications.
- AIt came into force on such date as the Central Government appointed by notification, and different dates may be appointed for different provisionsCorrect
- BIt came into force automatically on the date the President gave assent
- CIt came into force on the date fixed by each State Government for its own territory
- DIt came into force on one single date only, and different dates for different provisions are not permitted
Explanation
Section 1(3) lets the Central Government appoint the commencement date by notification and allows different dates for different provisions. A reference to commencement of the Act in any provision is read as commencement of that provision. The single-date option contradicts this.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Law relating to Information Technology shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Law relating to Information Technology questions
- CERT-In calls for information from a data centre in connection with a cyber security incident, and the data centre fails to supply it. Which…
- A law provides that the accounts and records of a body must be audited. The body maintains and processes these records only in electronic fo…
- Which of the following is a function that Section 70B(4) of the IT Act, 2000 assigns to the Indian Computer Emergency Response Team as the n…
- Meera and a company agreed, before an adjudicating officer under the IT Act, 2000, to the officer deciding a compensation claim, and the off…
- Mehta Exports Ltd programmes its order-processing system to automatically send purchase confirmations to suppliers. Due to a configuration e…
- An intermediary refuses to comply with a valid blocking direction issued under Section 69A(1) of the IT Act, 2000. What is the consequence p…