CS Professional · Intellectual Property Rights - Law and Practice · Biological Diversity
While approving an IPR application under section 6, the NBA wants to impose conditions on Veda Biotech Ltd on sharing the financial benefits of commercial use of the right. Which statement is correct under section 6(2)?
The NBA may impose a benefit sharing fee, a royalty, or both, or conditions including sharing of financial benefits arising from commercial use of the right. Section 6(2) is not limited to a one-time fee or to foreign applicants.
- AThe NBA may impose a benefit sharing fee or royalty or both, or impose conditions including sharing of financial benefitsCorrect
- BThe NBA can only impose a one-time fee and not royalty
- CThe NBA can impose conditions only if the applicant is a foreign entity
- DThe NBA cannot impose any financial condition and can only reject the application
Explanation
Section 6(2) lets the NBA, while granting approval, impose a benefit sharing fee or royalty or both, or conditions including sharing of financial benefits from commercial use. It is not limited to one-time fees or foreign entities.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Biological Diversity shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Biological Diversity questions
- Which of the following correctly describes the NBA's regulatory duty under the Act in its current form?
- After Rajasthan notifies a biodiversity heritage site, villagers who grazed cattle there lose their livelihood. Under Section 37 of the Biol…
- A State Biodiversity Board in Karnataka identifies an ancient grove as an area of biodiversity importance. Under Section 37 of the Biologica…
- Kharagpur Gram Panchayat in a rural area has not yet set up any committee for documenting local landraces and folk varieties of paddy. Under…
- For the financial year just ended, a BMC has maintained accounts and its Local Biodiversity Fund custodian has prepared the annual statement…
- Himalaya Bioextracts Ltd was penalised by an adjudicating officer under the Biological Diversity Act, 2002. The company received a copy of t…