CMA Intermediate · Cost Accounting · Contract Costing
While executing a contract, the contractee orders additional work outside the original scope. The usual accounting treatment in contract costing is to:
Extra work ordered by the contractee is normally added to the original contract price, and its costs are debited to the same contract account, so profit is measured on the revised contract value. It is treated separately only when it is a distinct contract, not merely by default.
- AIgnore the extra work until the whole contract is complete
- BTreat the extra work as a separate contract in all cases, never combining it
- CAdd the agreed extra work price to the contract price and its cost to the contract account, if it is not a distinct contractCorrect
- DCharge the cost of extra work to the Costing Profit and Loss Account immediately
Explanation
Extra work ordered by the contractee is added to the contract value and its cost is debited to the same contract account, unless it is treated as a separate contract. Charging it directly to the P&L account would omit the matching revenue.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Contract Costing shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Contract Costing questions
- Sharma Builders is constructing a bridge. Work certified is ₹40,00,000 and the contractee retains 10% of it as retention money. Cash receive…
- Shree Infra Ltd. has a contract with plant costing ₹8,00,000 at the start of the year. Plant is depreciated at 10% p.a. on cost. The plant w…
- A contract was started during the year. Direct costs incurred are ₹9,00,000. Outstanding wages at year end are ₹40,000 and prepaid site rent…
- A contractor, Shree Constructions, has a contract price of Rs 50,00,000. Work certified is Rs 30,00,000 and cash received is Rs 27,00,000, b…
- For a contract in progress, the cost of work certified is ₹18,00,000 and the cost of work uncertified is ₹2,00,000. Work certified is valued…
- Which statement about profit on an incomplete contract is correct under the conventional approach?