Skip to content

CA Final · Advanced Auditing, Assurance and Professional Ethics · Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) & Environment, Social and Governance (ESG) Assurance

While performing a limited assurance engagement on the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions statement of Kaveri Cements Ltd, CA Rohan finds that the company's emission factors come from a published government source, but the company has applied them to fuel quantities taken from unreconciled plant logs. What is the most appropriate response by Rohan?

Rohan should obtain further evidence on the completeness and accuracy of the fuel quantity data, for example by reconciling plant logs with purchase records and meter readings. Emissions depend on both activity data and factors, so an authoritative factor source does not make unreliable activity data acceptable.

  1. AAccept the figures since the emission factors are from an authoritative source
  2. BObtain evidence over the completeness and accuracy of the fuel quantity data, such as reconciling logs to purchase records and meter readings, before concludingCorrect
  3. CIssue an adverse conclusion immediately because logs are unreconciled
  4. DDisclaim the engagement as GHG data can never be verified

Explanation

Emissions equal activity data multiplied by emission factors, so reliable factors do not compensate for unreliable activity data. The assurer should perform procedures on the source data's completeness and accuracy, and then evaluate any misstatement. An immediate adverse conclusion or disclaimer is premature before such procedures.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) & Environment, Social and Governance (ESG) Assurance shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) & Environment, Social and Governance (ESG) Assurance questions