CMA Intermediate · Corporate Accounting and Auditing · Secretarial Audit
Zenith Textiles Ltd, a listed company, received a secretarial audit report containing an adverse remark about delayed filing of a return. Under the Companies Act, 2013, what must the Board do?
The Board must explain in full the qualification or observation in its Board's report. Section 204(3) places this duty on the directors, so the remark cannot be ignored, withdrawn by request or disclosed only to the Registrar.
- AExplain in full the qualification or observation in its Board's reportCorrect
- BIgnore the remark, as it is only advisory
- CSeek the secretarial auditor's withdrawal of the remark before the AGM
- DDisclose the remark only to the Registrar and not to members
Explanation
Section 204(3) requires the Board of Directors, in its report under section 134(3), to explain in full any qualification, observation or other remarks made by the company secretary in practice. The remark is therefore not advisory and cannot be left unexplained.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Secretarial Audit shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Secretarial Audit questions
- Wellspring Foods Ltd, a listed company, receives a secretarial audit report containing qualifications and observations from the company secr…
- Under the Companies Act, 2013, a secretarial audit report annexed to the Board's report of a listed company must be given by which of the fo…
- A company that is neither a small company nor a start-up contravenes section 204. Under the text of section 204(4), what is the penalty on t…
- Which statement correctly distinguishes section 204 from section 205 of the Companies Act, 2013?
- Section 204 of the Companies Act, 2013 casts a duty on the company in relation to the secretarial auditor. Which is that duty?
- A listed company, its officer in default and the secretarial auditor all contravene section 204. As per the text of the section, what is the…