ACCA Applied Skills · Corporate and Business Law (Global) · Capital maintenance and dividend law
Zephyr Ltd, a private company, wishes to reduce its share capital by cancelling shares that are no longer represented by available assets. Under the general principle of capital maintenance, why is a reduction of share capital generally subject to strict rules?
Reduction of share capital is strictly regulated because share capital acts as a cushion for creditors of a limited liability company. Returning it to shareholders without safeguards could leave creditors unpaid, so the law imposes procedures and protections before capital can be reduced.
- ABecause share capital is a fund that creditors rely on as security, so it should not be returned to shareholders without safeguardsCorrect
- BBecause shareholders are always entitled to veto any change to the company's capital
- CBecause only public companies are permitted to hold share capital
- DBecause a reduction automatically triggers the company's liquidation
Explanation
The capital maintenance doctrine treats share capital as a buffer for creditors, since members have limited liability. Reductions are therefore regulated to prevent capital being returned to members to the creditors' detriment. The other options misstate the law: there is no automatic liquidation and private companies may hold share capital.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Capital maintenance and dividend law shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Capital maintenance and dividend law questions
- Dunmore Ltd, a private company, proposes to reduce its share capital and return the surplus to shareholders. Its articles do not prohibit re…
- Orchid Co has passed a special resolution to reduce its share capital by repaying $1 per share to members on 100,000 shares. Which of the fo…
- Orchid plc has just bought back some of its shares out of distributable profits, and the shares are cancelled. Which of the following is the…
- Tavi Ltd's articles allow the directors to pay interim dividends. The directors paid one when the company had no distributable profits, rely…
- Marlow Co has issued share capital of 500,000 and accumulated losses of 200,000, which the directors consider are permanently lost. The comp…
- Brindle Ltd has issued redeemable preference shares that it must redeem at a future date. Which of the following is correct about redeeming …