Skip to content

ACCA Applied Knowledge · Financial Accounting · Disclosure notes

Zeta Co is defending a legal claim. Its lawyers advise that it is possible, but not probable, that the company will lose and have to pay damages. A reliable estimate of the amount can be made. How should Zeta Co treat the claim in its financial statements under IAS 37?

Zeta Co should disclose a contingent liability in the notes only. The outflow is possible rather than probable, so the recognition criteria for a provision are not met, but because the chance is not remote, IAS 37 requires note disclosure.

  1. ARecognise a provision and disclose it in the notes
  2. BDisclose a contingent liability in the notes onlyCorrect
  3. CRecognise a contingent asset in the notes
  4. DMake no disclosure because the outflow is not probable

Explanation

A possible but not probable outflow is a contingent liability. IAS 37 requires disclosure in the notes, not recognition. A provision requires the outflow to be probable, and no disclosure is only appropriate when the chance of outflow is remote.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Disclosure notes shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Disclosure notes questions