Skip to content

ACCA Strategic Professional · Advanced Financial Management · Financial reconstruction

Zeta plc is insolvent. Its secured creditors would be repaid in full from asset sales, but unsecured creditors would receive only 20 cents per dollar in a liquidation. Which feature of a financial reconstruction scheme best explains why unsecured creditors might rationally accept a scheme paying them more than 20 cents per dollar in total value?

Unsecured creditors may accept a scheme paying more than the liquidation return because a reconstruction avoids liquidation costs and forced-sale discounts and preserves going concern value. The scheme therefore makes the total value available higher than in liquidation, so creditors can be better off by agreeing to it.

  1. ALiquidation costs are avoided and the going concern value of the business is retainedCorrect
  2. BCreditors are legally prevented from voting against any proposed scheme
  3. CInterest on all debt is automatically cancelled once a scheme starts
  4. DShareholders must always be paid before unsecured creditors in a scheme

Explanation

Creditors compare the scheme with the liquidation alternative. A scheme avoids liquidator costs and forced-sale discounts and keeps going concern value, so a payout above the liquidation return can still be rational. The other options misstate the legal position: creditors can vote against, interest is not automatically cancelled, and shareholders rank behind creditors.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Financial reconstruction shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Financial reconstruction questions