Skip to content

CFA Level III · Private Markets Pathway

General Partner and Investor Perspectives and the Investment Process

This chapter explains how general partners (GPs) and limited partners (LPs) view private markets, how fund terms align their interests, and how a GP sources, selects, monitors and exits investments. You solve questions by tying each term or step to who benefits, who bears risk and what the client needs.

What this chapter covers

This chapter sits in the Private Markets pathway. It covers the two sides of every private fund: the general partner, who raises capital and runs the investments, and the limited partner, who commits capital and hopes to earn returns net of fees. It then follows the life of an investment: sourcing, due diligence, selection, monitoring, value creation and exit.

The chapter has two layers. The first is relationship and incentives: fees, carried interest, hurdle rates, clawbacks, key person clauses and governance rights. The second is process: what a GP checks before it invests, what it does after, and how it chooses an exit route.

It connects to the rest of the paper because later chapters on specific private asset classes reuse this framework. It also links to the common core. Asset allocation and portfolio construction decide how much a client can commit to illiquid assets. Ethics matters because conflicts between GPs and LPs are a standard case-study theme. Read the chapter as one story: who wants what, how the contract aligns them, and how the process delivers returns.

Pathway topics carry a large share of the exam, and this chapter supplies the vocabulary and logic for the other private markets chapters. Questions are often applied: a vignette gives fund terms or a deal situation, and you must judge alignment, spot a weakness or justify a recommendation in an essay. If you know the incentives and the process well, you can answer these in few words and earn the points reliably. If you only memorise definitions, you will struggle when the case twists them.

General Partner and Investor Perspectives and the Investment Process: topics in the order to study them

  1. 1GP and LP Perspectives in Private MarketsStart here because every later term makes sense only once you know what each party wants, risks and controls.
  2. 2Alignment of Interests and Fund TermsFund terms are the tools that reconcile GP and LP goals, so learn them straight after the two perspectives.
  3. 3Private Markets Investment Process OverviewThis gives you the map of stages before you study each stage in detail.
  4. 4Due Diligence and Investment SelectionThis is the first and most question-heavy stage, so study it once you have the overall flow.
  5. 5Portfolio Monitoring, Value Creation and ExitThis closes the cycle and links back to fund terms, because exits trigger distributions, carry and clawback issues.

How to prepare General Partner and Investor Perspectives and the Investment Process

Treat this as a conceptual chapter with a few calculations. Aim to explain each idea in one or two sentences tied to a party and a motive.

  1. Read the GP and LP perspectives and write a short table in your notes: objectives, risks, constraints and control for each party.
  2. Learn each fund term with three parts: what it is, who it protects, and what problem it solves. Do this for management fee, carried interest, hurdle rate, catch-up, waterfall, clawback, key person and no-fault removal.
  3. Practise simple fee and distribution calculations step by step. Write each line to keep your own accuracy high. In essay calculations a correct number on its own earns full credit, so working is for your benefit and does not earn extra marks.
  4. Draw the investment process as a flow from sourcing to exit and list the main GP activities and LP concerns at each stage.
  5. For due diligence, build a checklist by area, such as strategy, team, track record, terms, operations and legal. Then practise saying which red flag matters most in a given case.
  6. Answer past-style essay questions with the command word in mind. If asked to justify, give the conclusion and one linked reason. If asked to identify, list only what is asked.
  7. Finish by tying each topic to a client's objectives and constraints, since the exam expects a recommendation fitted to the client.

Common mistakes in General Partner and Investor Perspectives and the Investment Process

  • Listing fund terms without saying whom they protect.

    Fix: For each term, add one clause: it protects the LP, the GP, or both, and from what problem.

  • Mixing up the hurdle rate, catch-up and clawback.

    Fix: Remember the order: hurdle is the entry bar, catch-up is the GP's recovery, clawback is the later correction if carry was overpaid.

  • Giving a generic due diligence list that ignores the case.

    Fix: Pick the specific red flag in the case and explain its impact on the decision in one or two lines.

  • Skipping steps in fee and distribution calculations.

    Fix: Write each tier in order: return of capital, hurdle, catch-up, then split. Show the number at each step.

  • Writing long essay answers that go beyond the command word.

    Fix: Answer exactly what is asked, in the number of responses requested, and stop once the reason is given.

  • Ignoring the client's liquidity and objectives when recommending a fund.

    Fix: State the client's need first, then show how the fund terms and illiquidity fit or clash with it.

Last-day revision: General Partner and Investor Perspectives and the Investment Process

  • GPs manage the fund and earn fees and carry; LPs supply capital and have limited liability and limited control.
  • Management fee compensates the GP for running the fund; carried interest rewards performance.
  • LPs must receive the preferred return (hurdle rate) before the GP earns carried interest; with a catch-up, the GP then takes a larger share of subsequent profits until it has its agreed percentage of total profits.
  • A catch-up lets the GP receive a larger share of profits after the hurdle until it reaches its agreed profit share.
  • A whole-of-fund (European) waterfall returns all contributed capital and the hurdle to LPs before any carry, so it is more LP-friendly; a deal-by-deal (American) waterfall pays carry earlier and so needs clawback protection.
  • A clawback makes the GP return excess carry if LPs end up short of their agreed return.
  • Key person and removal clauses protect LPs if the team changes or performs badly.
  • Co-investment by the GP aligns interests because the GP shares losses.
  • The process runs from sourcing and screening to due diligence, structuring, monitoring, value creation and exit.
  • Due diligence tests the strategy, team, track record, terms, operations and legal and tax risks.
  • Exit routes include sale to a strategic buyer, sale to another fund, public listing and recapitalisation.
  • In every answer, link the point to the client's objectives and constraints, including liquidity.

General Partner and Investor Perspectives and the Investment Process in other exams

The same ground in other exams, if you are preparing for more than one or want another angle on it.

General Partner and Investor Perspectives and the Investment Process: frequently asked questions

What is the difference between a GP and an LP?

The GP manages the fund, makes investment decisions and earns fees and carried interest. The LP provides capital, has limited liability and limited control, and receives returns net of fees.

How is this chapter tested on the Level III exam?

It appears in pathway item sets and essay sets. You may need to judge whether fund terms align interests, compute fees or distributions, or justify a due diligence or exit decision for a given client.

Do I need to memorise calculation formulas for fund waterfalls?

You need to understand the order of payments and be able to apply them step by step. In essay calculations a correct number on its own earns full credit, so write your working for your own accuracy, not for extra marks.

How long should I spend on this chapter?

Spend enough to explain each term and stage in your own words and finish a few timed practice sets. Prioritise fund terms and due diligence, as they lend themselves to applied questions.