Skip to content

Private Markets Pathway · General Partner and Investor Perspectives and the Investment Process

Private Markets Investment Process: Steps from Sourcing to Exit

Updated 8 October 2026 · Fact-checked

The private markets investment process is the sequence a general partner (GP) follows to turn capital into returns: source deals, screen them, run due diligence, structure and execute the deal, monitor and add value, then exit. On the exam, name the stage, then link your answer to the fund's strategy and the investors' interests.

Understand Private Markets Investment Process Overview

A private markets fund does not buy from a public exchange. The GP must find opportunities itself, decide which are worth time, and negotiate each one. That is why the process is organised as stages. Each stage filters out weak deals and builds the case for the strong ones.

Sourcing is finding deal flow. Sources include the GP's network, intermediaries such as investment banks and brokers, proprietary outreach to owners, existing portfolio companies, and co-investors. Proprietary deals (not shown to many bidders) usually face less competition and can be priced better, but they take more effort to build.

Screening is a fast first filter. The GP checks each deal against the fund's mandate: strategy, sector, geography, size, expected return, and risk. Most deals are rejected here. Then comes due diligence: a detailed review of the business, financials, legal position, management, market, tax, and ESG matters. Its output feeds valuation, deal structure, and the investment committee decision.

Execution covers valuation, negotiation, financing, and legal documents, ending with closing. The fund's terms matter here too, such as concentration limits and use of leverage. After closing, monitoring and value creation begin: board seats, performance reporting, operational improvements, add-on acquisitions, and covenant tracking in debt deals. Finally, the exit realises the return, through a sale to a strategic buyer, a sale to another financial sponsor, an IPO, a recapitalisation, or a write-off in poor cases.

Keep the investor view in mind. Limited partners (LPs) cannot see every deal, so they judge the process itself: Is it repeatable? Is it disciplined? Does it fit the stated strategy? A clear, documented process is evidence of skill and helps alignment between GP and LP.

Key rules to remember

Stage sequence
Sourcing → Screening → Due diligence → Valuation and structuring → Execution (closing) → Monitoring and value creation → Exit
Know the order and the purpose of each stage. This is a framework, not a calculation.
Deal funnel yield
Deals closed ÷ Deals sourced
A simple measure of how selective the process is. A low ratio shows strong filtering but does not by itself prove skill.
Money multiple (for exit review)
Total value to paid-in (TVPI) = (Distributions + Remaining value) ÷ Paid-in capital
Use when an exam asks you to judge the outcome of the process after exit or partial exit.

How to solve Private Markets Investment Process Overview questions

Use this method for any item set or essay question on the investment process.

  1. 1Read the command word (identify, describe, justify, recommend). It sets how much you write.
  2. 2Locate the stage the vignette is describing: sourcing, screening, due diligence, execution, monitoring, or exit.
  3. 3Pull out the fund's mandate and facts: strategy, size, sector, geography, leverage limits, and investor constraints.
  4. 4Apply the purpose of that stage to the facts. Ask what the GP is trying to learn or protect at this point.
  5. 5Check for conflicts or mismatches, such as a deal outside the mandate or an exit that hurts LPs.
  6. 6Give your answer in one clear sentence, then one reason tied to the vignette.
  7. 7If a calculation is needed, show the formula and the number, and label units.

Quickest way: Stage-and-purpose check

When to use it: Use when you have under two minutes for a multiple-choice item on the process.

  1. Name the stage in two or three words.
  2. Ask what question that stage answers: is it in mandate, is it sound, what price and terms, how to grow value, or how to realise value.
  3. Eliminate options that belong to a different stage.
  4. Choose the option that fits both the stage purpose and the fund's stated strategy.

Common mistakes in Private Markets Investment Process Overview

  • Mixing up screening and due diligence.

    Both involve assessing a deal, so they sound alike.

    Fix: Screening is quick and checks fit with the mandate. Due diligence is deep, costly verification after a deal passes screening.

  • Treating sourcing as passive.

    Students assume deals simply arrive from advisers.

    Fix: Remember proprietary sourcing through networks and direct outreach. It can reduce competition and improve pricing but needs effort.

  • Ending the process at closing.

    Execution feels like the finish line.

    Fix: Monitoring and value creation are part of the process, and the exit is where returns are realised.

  • Giving a generic answer that ignores the vignette.

    Students recall a list and write it out.

    Fix: Tie each point to the fund's strategy, size, or constraints using facts quoted from the vignette.

  • Assuming one exit route suits every deal.

    IPO is the best-known exit.

    Fix: Match the route to the asset: strategic sale, sponsor sale, IPO, or recapitalisation each fits different company size, market conditions, and timing.

  • Writing more than the command word asks.

    Fear of losing points.

    Fix: Only the number of responses requested is evaluated, in order. Give exactly that many, concise and ordered.

Worked examples

Example 1

A private equity fund focused on mid-sized healthcare buyouts in Europe receives 200 opportunities in a year. After a first review, 40 remain. After detailed due diligence, 8 reach the investment committee and 5 close. (a) Calculate the deal funnel yield. (b) Identify the stage that cut the number from 200 to 40 and state its purpose.

Show the solution
  1. Deal funnel yield = deals closed ÷ deals sourced = 5 ÷ 200.
  2. 5 ÷ 200 = 0.025, which is 2.5%.
  3. The drop from 200 to 40 happened in the first review, which is screening.
  4. Screening checks fit with the mandate (healthcare, Europe, mid-size, return and risk profile) before costly work begins.

Answer: (a) 2.5%. (b) Screening, which filters deals against the fund's mandate quickly so due diligence resources go only to suitable deals.

Example 2

A GP is considering an acquisition. The vendor is running a broad auction. A second target, a family-owned firm, has been approached directly by the GP with no other bidders. Justify which sourcing route is likely to give more negotiating power, and state one drawback.

Show the solution
  1. Identify the routes: auction (intermediated, many bidders) and proprietary (direct approach, no competition).
  2. Competition raises price in an auction, which lowers expected return.
  3. With no rival bidders, the GP can negotiate on price and terms, so negotiating power is higher.
  4. Drawback: proprietary sourcing takes time and relationship effort, and the GP may have less information from a formal vendor process.

Answer: The proprietary approach to the family-owned firm gives more negotiating power because there are no competing bidders. The drawback is the time and effort needed to build the relationship, with less ready information than an auction provides.

Exam tips

  • Match each vignette fact to a stage first. Most wrong answers belong to a different stage.
  • In essays, answer with the stage purpose plus one fact from the case. Do not list everything you know.
  • Expect questions that link the process to LP concerns, such as discipline, mandate fit and alignment.
  • If a calculation appears, such as funnel yield or a multiple, type the number clearly. A correct number alone earns full credit.
  • Watch for mandate mismatch traps: a good deal outside strategy should still be rejected at screening.

Private Markets Investment Process Overview: frequently asked questions

What are the main steps in the private equity investment process?

The steps are sourcing, screening, due diligence, valuation and structuring, execution, monitoring and value creation, and exit. Each stage has its own purpose. You should be able to say what question each stage answers.

How do GPs source deals?

They use their networks, intermediaries such as banks and brokers, direct outreach to owners, existing portfolio companies, and co-investors. Proprietary deals can face less competition. They usually take more effort to build.

What is the difference between screening and due diligence?

Screening is a quick check that a deal fits the fund's mandate and return targets. Due diligence is a detailed review of financial, legal, commercial, management and other matters. It happens only for deals that pass screening.

Why do LPs care about the investment process?

LPs cannot review every deal, so a disciplined and repeatable process is evidence of GP skill. It also shows that deals match the stated strategy, which supports alignment of interests.