Economic, Commercial and Intellectual Property Laws · Law relating to Copyright
Copyright Infringement, Exceptions and Fair Dealing
Updated 11 October 2026 · Fact-checked
Copyright infringement means doing, without the owner's licence, something that only the owner may do with the work. The Act also lists acts that are not infringement, such as fair dealing for criticism, review or reporting. To answer a question, identify the act, check the exceptions, then apply the remedies.
Understand Infringement, Exceptions and Fair Dealing
Copyright gives the owner exclusive rights over a work, such as copying it, publishing it or communicating it to the public. Infringement happens when someone does one of these reserved acts without a licence from the owner or the Registrar of Copyrights, or in breach of a licence condition. Selling, letting on hire or distributing infringing copies is also treated as infringement.
The law does not give the owner absolute control. Section 52 lists acts that are not infringement. The best known is fair dealing: using a work for private or personal use including research, for criticism or review, or for reporting current events. The Act does not define fair dealing with a formula. Courts look at the purpose, the amount taken, the effect on the market for the original, and whether the use is genuine.
Rights of performers and broadcasters are protected too. Under section 39, no broadcast reproduction right or performer's right is infringed by a private-use or bona fide teaching or research recording. It is also not infringed by fair dealing use of excerpts in reporting current events or for bona fide review, teaching or research. It is also not infringed by any act that section 52 treats as non-infringement of copyright, with necessary adaptations and modifications.
If infringement is proved, the owner has civil remedies. Section 55(1) gives remedies by way of injunction, damages, accounts and otherwise, as conferred by law for infringement of a right. The Act also provides criminal remedies for infringement, which you should study with the offences and penalties provisions. Keep civil and criminal remedies separate in your answer.
Section 55 also protects an innocent infringer to a degree, and it gives the owner a helpful presumption of authorship. Both points are tested often.
Key rules to remember
- Civil remedies (section 55(1))
- Injunction + damages + accounts + other remedies conferred by law for infringement of a right
- Available to the owner of the copyright, except as otherwise provided by the Act.
- Innocent infringer proviso (section 55(1))
- Defendant proves: not aware AND no reasonable ground for believing copyright subsisted → only injunction + decree for whole or part of profits from sale of infringing copies
- The defendant must prove both limbs. The court decides how much of the profits is reasonable. No damages in this case.
- Presumption of authorship or publisher (section 55(2))
- Name appearing on published copies (or on an artistic work when made) → presumed author or publisher unless contrary proved
- Covers literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works, and, subject to section 13(3), cinematograph films and sound recordings.
- Costs (section 55(3))
- Costs of all parties = discretion of the court
- Applies to all proceedings in respect of infringement of copyright.
- Section 39 exceptions
- (a) private use or bona fide teaching/research recording; (b) fair dealing excerpts for current events reporting or bona fide review, teaching, research; (c) acts not infringing copyright under section 52
- These protect against infringement of broadcast reproduction right and performer's right.
How to solve Infringement, Exceptions and Fair Dealing questions
Use the same sequence for any problem or theory question on infringement and fair dealing.
- 1Identify the work and the right: is it a literary, musical, film or other work, or a performer's or broadcast right?
- 2Identify the act done by the defendant: copying, publishing, selling, hiring, public communication or something else.
- 3Check whether the defendant had a licence from the owner or Registrar, and whether its conditions were followed.
- 4Test the exceptions: section 52 for copyright, section 39 for performer's and broadcast rights. Look at the purpose, the extent of use and the effect on the owner.
- 5If no exception applies, conclude that there is infringement.
- 6State the civil remedies under section 55: injunction, damages, accounts. Add the innocent infringer limit if the facts show lack of knowledge.
- 7Mention criminal remedies briefly if the question asks for all remedies, and end with a clear conclusion.
Quickest way: Act, Exception, Remedy
When to use it: Use it when time is short or the question is a short case-based one.
- Write one line naming the act and the right affected.
- Write one line on the exception that fits or does not fit, with purpose and extent.
- Write the conclusion: infringed or not infringed.
- Write the remedy in one line: injunction, damages, accounts, plus any proviso that applies.
Common mistakes in Infringement, Exceptions and Fair Dealing
Treating any use with credit to the author as fair dealing.
Students think acknowledgement is a defence.
Fix: Fair dealing depends on purpose and extent of use. Credit helps but does not by itself make a use fair.
Giving full damages against an innocent infringer.
Students forget the proviso to section 55(1).
Fix: If the defendant proves no awareness and no reasonable ground to believe copyright subsisted, the owner gets only an injunction and a decree for profits from sale of infringing copies, as the court deems reasonable.
Applying section 39 to ordinary copyright in a book.
Both sections talk about fair dealing.
Fix: Section 39 deals with broadcast reproduction right and performer's right. Section 52 deals with copyright exceptions.
Placing the burden of proof on the wrong side in the authorship presumption.
Students read section 55(2) loosely.
Fix: The person whose name appears is presumed to be the author or publisher unless the contrary is proved. The challenger must prove otherwise.
Mixing civil and criminal remedies in one list.
Both flow from infringement.
Fix: Write them under separate headings. Section 55 covers the civil side: injunction, damages, accounts and otherwise.
Saying costs follow the result automatically.
General litigation habit.
Fix: Section 55(3) leaves costs of all parties to the court's discretion.
Worked examples
Example 1
Ravi, a journalist, plays a two-minute excerpt of a broadcast of a live music performance on his news channel while reporting a current event related to the concert. The broadcaster alleges infringement of its broadcast reproduction right. Advise.
Show the solution
- Provision: under section 39(b), no broadcast reproduction right or performer's right is infringed by the use, consistent with fair dealing, of excerpts of a performance or broadcast in the reporting of current events.
- Facts: the use is a short excerpt, used to report a current event.
- Analysis: the purpose is reporting current events and the extent is limited, so the use appears consistent with fair dealing. If Ravi had broadcast the entire performance, the position would differ.
- Conclusion: there is no infringement, provided the use stays within fair dealing.
Answer: Ravi is not liable under section 39(b), because a short excerpt used to report current events and consistent with fair dealing does not infringe the broadcast reproduction right.
Example 2
Meera sells copies of a novel without a licence. The owner sues. Meera proves she was not aware, and had no reasonable ground for believing, that copyright subsisted in the novel. What remedies can the owner get?
Show the solution
- Provision: section 55(1) gives the owner remedies by way of injunction, damages, accounts and otherwise.
- Proviso: if the defendant proves that at the date of infringement she was not aware and had no reasonable ground for believing that copyright subsisted, the plaintiff gets no remedy other than an injunction and a decree for the whole or part of the profits made by the defendant by the sale of infringing copies, as the court deems reasonable.
- Facts: Meera has proved both limbs, so the proviso applies.
- Conclusion: damages are not available. The owner can get an injunction and a decree for profits from sale of infringing copies, as much as the court finds reasonable.
Answer: The owner is limited to an injunction and a decree for the whole or part of Meera's profits from selling the infringing copies, as the court deems reasonable. Damages are not available.
Exam tips
- Always name the section: section 55 for civil remedies and section 39 for performer's and broadcast rights, and section 52 for copyright exceptions.
- In case problems, state the exception's conditions first and then match each fact to them before concluding.
- Learn the proviso to section 55(1) word for word in substance. Examiners like questions on the innocent infringer.
- Keep civil and criminal remedies in separate paragraphs and end with a one-line conclusion.
Practice questions from Law relating to Copyright
- Kavita, a lyricist, wrote songs for a film and assigned all her rights to the producer, with a clause waiving her right to share royalties e…
- Under the Copyright Act, 1957, the Central Government issues an order under Section 40 extending the Act to works from Country X, which is n…
- During an appeal against a tariff scheme, the parties disagree on what should be paid meanwhile. Under the Copyright Act, 1957, what may the…
- A Bengaluru software firm develops a computer programme. Which additional right does Section 14(b) give for a computer programme compared wi…
- A bookseller, Kiran, holds 500 copies of a textbook that the owner claims are infringing copies. Kiran proves he had reasonable grounds for …
Infringement, Exceptions and Fair Dealing in other exams
The same ground in other exams, if you are preparing for more than one or want another angle on it.
Infringement, Exceptions and Fair Dealing: frequently asked questions
What is not infringement of copyright?
Section 52 lists acts that do not infringe copyright, including fair dealing for permitted purposes. For performer's and broadcast rights, section 39 covers private-use or bona fide teaching or research recordings, fair dealing excerpts for current events or review, and acts that section 52 treats as non-infringing.
What civil remedies does the owner get?
Under section 55(1), the owner can seek injunction, damages, accounts and other remedies available in law for infringement of a right. Costs are in the court's discretion under section 55(3).
Can an innocent infringer be made to pay damages?
If the defendant proves she was not aware and had no reasonable ground to believe copyright subsisted, the owner gets only an injunction and a decree for profits from sale of infringing copies. The court decides the amount of profits that is reasonable.
Is fair dealing defined in the Act?
No formula is given in the text. You decide it from the purpose of use, the extent taken and the effect on the owner. Use the wording of the relevant section to state permitted purposes.