Skip to content

Corporate Restructuring, Valuation and Insolvency · Valuation of Business and Assets for Corporate Restructuring

Valuation Approaches: Asset, Income and Market Approach

Updated 11 October 2026 · Fact-checked

The three approaches to business valuation are the asset approach (value of what the business owns less what it owes), the income approach (present value of future cash flows or earnings) and the market approach (value derived from prices of comparable businesses). You pick the approach that fits the business, the purpose and the data available, and often use more than one.

Understand Valuation Approaches: Asset, Income and Market

Valuation answers one question: what is this business worth, for this purpose, on this date? Every valuation method falls under one of three approaches. The approach tells you where the value comes from.

The asset approach looks at the balance sheet. The business is worth what it owns minus what it owes. You can use book values or adjust assets and liabilities to fair value. It suits asset-heavy firms, holding companies, real estate firms and companies being liquidated. It ignores future earning power, so it can undervalue a profitable business with few physical assets, such as a software firm.

The income approach looks at the future. A business is worth the benefits it will produce, discounted to today for time and risk. The usual methods are discounted cash flow (DCF) and capitalisation of earnings. It suits going concerns with reasonably forecastable cash flows. Its weakness is that small changes in the discount rate or growth rate change the value a lot, and forecasts can be biased.

The market approach looks at what others pay. You find listed companies or recent deals that are similar, work out a multiple such as price to earnings or EV to EBITDA, and apply it to your business. It suits businesses with good comparables. Its weakness is that no two firms are identical, and market prices can be distorted.

In mergers and demergers, the valuer usually applies more than one approach and then assigns weights to the results, giving reasons. The report must explain why each approach was used, or left out.

Key rules to remember

Net asset value (asset approach)
Net asset value = Fair value of assets − Liabilities
Exclude fictitious assets such as preliminary expenses. Use adjusted values where the question gives them. Divide by number of equity shares for value per share.
Value under income approach (DCF)
Enterprise value = Σ [FCFt ÷ (1 + r)^t] + Terminal value ÷ (1 + r)^n
FCF is free cash flow, r is the discount rate and n is the final forecast year. Equity value = enterprise value − debt + surplus cash.
Terminal value (constant growth)
Terminal value = FCFn × (1 + g) ÷ (r − g)
Valid only when r is greater than g. Growth g must be sustainable.
Capitalisation of earnings
Value = Maintainable earnings ÷ Capitalisation rate
Use normalised earnings, not one-off peaks or troughs.
Market approach using a multiple
Value = Comparable multiple × Subject metric
Example: equity value = P/E multiple × earnings. For EV/EBITDA, subtract net debt to reach equity value.
Weighted value
Weighted value = Σ (Value by each method × Weight), with weights adding to 100%
Weights are a matter of judgement and must be justified.

How to solve Valuation Approaches: Asset, Income and Market questions

Use this sequence for any question on choosing or applying a valuation approach.

  1. 1Identify the purpose and date: merger, demerger, sale, buyback or liquidation. Purpose decides the basis of value.
  2. 2Note the nature of the business: asset-heavy or asset-light, going concern or not, stable or fast growing, listed or unlisted.
  3. 3Check the data given: balance sheet, cash flow forecasts or comparable multiples. The data often points to the intended approach.
  4. 4Pick the approach and give a reason linked to the facts. Say which approaches are less suitable and why.
  5. 5If numbers are given, apply the matching formula step by step and show each line.
  6. 6Cross-check with a second approach where data allows, and note any large gap.
  7. 7Where several values result, assign weights with reasons and state the final value.
  8. 8Conclude with a clear statement of the value and the key assumptions.

Quickest way: Match business type to approach

When to use it: Use this for short theory or case questions that ask which approach is appropriate.

  1. Asset-heavy, loss-making, holding company or winding up: asset approach.
  2. Profitable going concern with forecastable cash flows: income approach.
  3. Good listed or deal comparables exist: market approach.
  4. For a merger exchange ratio, say you would use more than one approach and weight them.
  5. Write one line of reason and one line of limitation for each approach you name.

Common mistakes in Valuation Approaches: Asset, Income and Market

  • Using the asset approach for a profitable service or technology business.

    Book values are easy to find and students stop there.

    Fix: Say that the asset approach misses earning power and goodwill. Prefer income or market approach for asset-light going concerns.

  • Calling price-to-earnings or EV/EBITDA multiples part of the income approach.

    Both use earnings figures.

    Fix: If the multiple comes from comparable companies or deals, it is the market approach. The income approach discounts or capitalises the business's own future benefits.

  • Forgetting to deduct debt when moving from enterprise value to equity value.

    DCF gives a value for the whole business and students treat it as the shareholders' value.

    Fix: Equity value = enterprise value − debt + surplus cash. Check which one the question wants.

  • Using a terminal growth rate equal to or above the discount rate.

    Students pick a high growth rate without checking the formula.

    Fix: Terminal value needs r greater than g. Use a modest long-term growth rate.

  • Including fictitious assets or ignoring contingent liabilities in net asset value.

    Students copy the balance sheet total.

    Fix: Remove assets such as preliminary expenses and discount balance, then adjust for items the question flags.

  • Giving a list of approaches without linking to the facts in a case question.

    Students memorise definitions only.

    Fix: Name a fact from the case, state the approach it points to, and conclude.

Worked examples

Example 1

Sunrise Textiles Ltd has fixed assets at fair value ₹80,00,000, current assets ₹30,00,000 and a preliminary expenses balance of ₹2,00,000 (included in the ₹30,00,000). Its liabilities are ₹40,00,000. It has 1,00,000 equity shares. Find the value per share under the asset approach.

Show the solution
  1. Current assets after removing the fictitious asset = ₹30,00,000 − ₹2,00,000 = ₹28,00,000.
  2. Total assets = ₹80,00,000 + ₹28,00,000 = ₹1,08,00,000.
  3. Net asset value = ₹1,08,00,000 − ₹40,00,000 = ₹68,00,000.
  4. Value per share = ₹68,00,000 ÷ 1,00,000 = ₹68.

Answer: Net asset value is ₹68,00,000 and the value per share is ₹68.

Example 2

Meera Foods Ltd expects free cash flow of ₹10,00,000 in each of the next 2 years. After year 2, cash flows are expected to stay at ₹10,00,000 forever (no growth). The discount rate is 10%. Debt is ₹30,00,000 and there is no surplus cash. Find the equity value using the income approach.

Show the solution
  1. Present value of year 1 = ₹10,00,000 ÷ 1.10 = ₹9,09,091 (rounded).
  2. Present value of year 2 = ₹10,00,000 ÷ 1.21 = ₹8,26,446 (rounded).
  3. Terminal value at end of year 2 = ₹10,00,000 ÷ 0.10 = ₹1,00,00,000 (growth is zero, so the perpetuity formula gives FCF ÷ r).
  4. Present value of terminal value = ₹1,00,00,000 ÷ 1.21 = ₹82,64,463 (rounded).
  5. Enterprise value = ₹9,09,091 + ₹8,26,446 + ₹82,64,463 = ₹1,00,00,000 (rounded).
  6. Check: a perpetuity of ₹10,00,000 at 10% is worth ₹1,00,00,000, which agrees.
  7. Equity value = ₹1,00,00,000 − ₹30,00,000 = ₹70,00,000.

Answer: Enterprise value is about ₹1,00,00,000 and equity value is about ₹70,00,000.

Exam tips

  • In case questions, tie your choice of approach to a stated fact such as asset-heavy, loss-making or listed peers. Marks go to the reasoning.
  • Always mention the limitation of each approach you name. Examiners look for balanced answers.
  • For numerical questions, show the bridge from enterprise value to equity value and the per-share step.
  • In merger valuation answers, say that more than one approach is used and weights are justified in the valuer's report.
  • Write formulas first, then substitute. Partial marks depend on visible working.

Practice questions from Valuation of Business and Assets for Corporate Restructuring

Valuation Approaches: Asset, Income and Market in other exams

The same ground in other exams, if you are preparing for more than one or want another angle on it.

Valuation Approaches: Asset, Income and Market: frequently asked questions

What are the three approaches to business valuation?

They are the asset approach, the income approach and the market approach. The asset approach values what the business owns less what it owes. The income approach values future benefits, and the market approach uses prices of comparable businesses.

What is the difference between the income approach and the market approach?

The income approach values the business from its own forecast cash flows or earnings, discounted for risk. The market approach values it from how the market prices similar businesses, using multiples. One looks inward at the business, the other looks outward at comparables.

Which valuation approach should be used in a merger?

There is no single rule. The valuer chooses based on the nature of the companies and the data, and commonly uses more than one approach with reasoned weights. The report should explain why each approach was used or not used.

Is DCF part of the income approach?

Yes. Discounted cash flow is the main method under the income approach. Capitalisation of earnings is another.