FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Future Value and Exposure
A bank has a single netting set with a counterparty containing two uncollateralised derivatives. Trade A has a current mark-to-market of +12 million and Trade B has a current mark-to-market of -5 million. Under a legally enforceable close-out netting agreement, what is the bank's current exposure to the counterparty?
The current exposure is 7 million. Enforceable close-out netting allows the bank to offset the 12 million gain against the 5 million loss, producing a single net claim of 7 million. Without netting, the exposure would be the 12 million positive value alone.
- A7 millionCorrect
- B12 million
- C5 million
- D17 million
Explanation
With enforceable close-out netting, the positive and negative values are summed: 12 - 5 = 7 million. Without netting the exposure would be 12 million (only positive values counted), which is the key distractor. 17 million adds absolute values, and 5 million uses the negative trade.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Future Value and Exposure shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Future Value and Exposure questions
- A bank sets limits on a client using PFE at 95% confidence. The exposure at a future date is normally distributed with mean 6 and standard d…
- A bank has a 5-year cross-currency swap with exchange of notional at maturity, and an otherwise identical 5-year interest rate swap in a sin…
- A risk analyst builds a Monte Carlo engine to estimate the future exposure of a portfolio of interest rate swaps with a single counterparty.…
- A Monte Carlo simulation of a netted portfolio gives the following ten equally likely portfolio values (in USD millions) at a future date: -…
- A bank computes exposures for a counterparty at the 1-year horizon. Under a netting agreement, the portfolio value V is normal with mean USD…
- A bank has an uncollateralised OTC derivative with a counterparty. The bank's risk team observes that the counterparty's probability of defa…