FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Counterparty Risk and Beyond
A bank has three OTC derivative trades with a single counterparty under an enforceable close-out netting agreement. The trade mark-to-market values to the bank are +12 million, -5 million and +4 million. No collateral is held. What is the bank's current credit exposure to the counterparty?
The exposure is 11 million. Under an enforceable close-out netting agreement, the trades are combined into one net amount: 12 minus 5 plus 4 equals 11 million, which is positive, so that is the loss if the counterparty defaults with no collateral held.
- A21 million
- B11 millionCorrect
- C16 million
- D7 million
Explanation
With enforceable close-out netting, exposure is the maximum of the net value and zero. Net = 12 - 5 + 4 = 11 million. The 21 million figure ignores netting and sums only the positive trades; 16 million nets only the positive trade against nothing and omits the +4 incorrectly in a different way; 7 million wrongly nets the negative against only one positive.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Counterparty Risk and Beyond shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Counterparty Risk and Beyond questions
- A bank has a single uncollateralised OTC interest rate swap with a corporate client. The swap currently has a negative mark-to-market value …
- A risk manager is assessing the residual risk in a collateralised OTC derivatives relationship with daily margining. Which feature best expl…
- A risk manager reports exposure profiles for a 5-year uncollateralized interest rate swap with a fixed notional paying a fixed rate. Which s…
- A bank argues that FVA should not be charged to clients because it double counts the DVA benefit it already recognises. Which statement best…
- A dealer is reviewing a CSA that allows the counterparty to post government bonds rather than cash. Compared with accepting cash in the same…
- Which feature of KVA distinguishes it from CVA and FVA in derivative pricing?