FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Counterparty Risk and Beyond
Which feature of KVA distinguishes it from CVA and FVA in derivative pricing?
KVA is the capital valuation adjustment, which charges for the cost of holding regulatory capital against a derivative over its life, based on shareholders' required return. It is distinct from CVA (counterparty default loss), FVA (funding costs) and DVA (own default).
- AIt reflects the cost of holding regulatory capital against the trade over its lifeCorrect
- BIt compensates for expected loss from counterparty default
- CIt reflects the cost of posting variation margin
- DIt adjusts for the bank's own default risk
Explanation
KVA prices the return required by shareholders on capital that must be held against the trade. CVA covers expected default loss, FVA covers funding costs, and DVA the bank's own default, so the other options describe different adjustments.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Counterparty Risk and Beyond shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Counterparty Risk and Beyond questions
- A bank estimates a counterparty's exposure at a future date as: 40% probability of a mark-to-market value of +USD 20 million, 20% probabilit…
- A bank prices an uncollateralised interest rate swap with a corporate client. Besides CVA and DVA, the trading desk adds a charge to reflect…
- A bank's regulator requires standardised OTC interest rate swaps to be cleared through a central counterparty (CCP). Which of the following …
- A CCP has the following default waterfall for a defaulting clearing member: defaulter's initial margin, then defaulter's default fund contri…
- A bank has three trades with one counterparty under a legally enforceable netting agreement, with no collateral. Mark-to-market values to th…
- A bank has three OTC derivative trades with a single counterparty under an enforceable close-out netting agreement. The trade mark-to-market…