FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Derivatives
A bank holds an uncollateralized interest rate swap with a corporate client. The swap currently has a mark-to-market value of -USD 3 million to the bank. Which statement best describes the bank's current exposure to the client on this trade?
Current exposure is the greater of the trade's mark-to-market value and zero. Because the swap is worth negative USD 3 million to the bank, its exposure is zero, as the bank owes the counterparty rather than being owed. Only positive value represents a potential loss on default.
- AUSD 3 million, because exposure equals the absolute value of the swap
- BZero, because the bank would owe money to the client and so would lose nothing on defaultCorrect
- CUSD 3 million, because the bank must pay the client on default
- DNegative USD 3 million, which reduces exposure on other trades automatically
Explanation
Current exposure is max(V, 0). With V = -3 million, exposure is 0 for this trade. The bank would still owe the value to the defaulted client's estate, but it has no claim to lose. The absolute-value option confuses exposure with notional-style size. Netting offsets would only apply if a netting agreement covers other trades.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Derivatives shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Derivatives questions
- Regulators have pushed standardised OTC derivatives into central clearing. Which is a recognised risk that this policy concentrates in the f…
- A CCP calls variation margin daily and holds initial margin sized to cover a 5-day close-out period. A clearing member defaults on Monday af…
- A bank uses the Basel standardised CVA approach and a risk manager observes that a portfolio of long-dated swaps with a lower-rated counterp…
- A bank's exposure to a counterparty is simulated at a future date with a normally distributed netted portfolio value having mean USD 4 milli…
- A bank has an unilateral CVA on a swap with a counterparty with a loss given default of 60%. Over three annual periods, the discounted expec…
- A bank has a put option on its counterparty's own shares, bought from that counterparty. Compared with a put on an unrelated stock bought fr…