FRM Part I · FRM Exam Part I · Calculating and Applying VaR
A bank runs a 99% one-day VaR model and backtests it over 250 trading days. The 99% VaR is exceeded on 7 days. Under the Basel traffic-light approach for 250 observations, how many exceptions would the model be expected to produce on average if it were perfectly calibrated?
The expected number of exceptions is 2.5, found by multiplying 250 days by the 1% tail probability of a 99% VaR. The observed 7 exceptions exceed this expectation, which signals possible underestimation of risk by the model.
- A0.25
- B1.0
- C2.5Correct
- D7.0
Explanation
Expected exceptions = number of observations times the tail probability = 250 x 0.01 = 2.5. Seven exceptions is well above this, which suggests the model underestimates risk. Option 7.0 confuses the observed count with the expected count.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Calculating and Applying VaR shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Calculating and Applying VaR questions
- A risk manager has a 1-day 95% VaR of USD 3.0 million for a portfolio with normally distributed returns and zero mean. Using z-values of 1.6…
- A bank uses historical simulation with full revaluation to compute 1-day 99% VaR for an options portfolio using 500 daily scenarios. Which o…
- A firm has a 99% one-day VaR of 2 million. Assuming normally distributed returns and independent days, what is the approximate 99% ten-day V…
- Which statement best describes a limitation of VaR that expected shortfall (ES) addresses?
- Compared with historical simulation, which statement about Monte Carlo simulation VaR for a portfolio containing options is most accurate?
- A risk manager computes a one-day 95% VaR for a portfolio worth USD 50 million with a daily return standard deviation of 2% and zero mean, a…