FRM Part I · FRM Exam Part I · Calculating and Applying VaR
A risk manager computes a one-day 95% VaR for a portfolio worth USD 50 million with a daily return standard deviation of 2% and zero mean, assuming normality (z = 1.645). The manager then increases the confidence level to 99% (z = 2.33) with the same data. By how much does VaR increase, to the nearest USD 0.01 million?
VaR rises by about USD 0.69 million. The 95% VaR is 1.645 × 2% × 50 million = 1.645 million, while the 99% VaR is 2.33 × 2% × 50 million = 2.33 million, and the difference is roughly 0.685 million.
- AUSD 0.69 millionCorrect
- BUSD 1.65 million
- CUSD 2.33 million
- DUSD 0.34 million
Explanation
95% VaR = 1.645 × 2% × 50m = USD 1.645m. 99% VaR = 2.33 × 2% × 50m = USD 2.33m. The increase is 2.33 − 1.645 = USD 0.685m, about 0.69m. USD 1.65m and 2.33m are the individual VaR figures, not the difference.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Calculating and Applying VaR shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Calculating and Applying VaR questions
- A risk analyst estimates the 1-day 99% VaR of a portfolio using Monte Carlo simulation. She generates 10,000 simulated daily P&L outcomes an…
- Compared with historical simulation, which statement about Monte Carlo simulation VaR for a portfolio containing options is most accurate?
- A bank runs a 99% one-day VaR model and backtests it over 250 trading days. The 99% VaR is exceeded on 7 days. Under the Basel traffic-light…
- A trader holds a long call option on a stock priced at USD 100 with delta 0.60. The stock's daily volatility is 2%. Using the delta-normal a…
- When simulating correlated risk factors for a Monte Carlo VaR of a portfolio with two assets, which step correctly introduces the desired co…
- A portfolio manager reports a one-day 99% VaR of USD 2.0 million. Which statement correctly interprets this figure?