FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Credit Value Adjustment
A bank trades an uncollateralised swap with a client. Expected positive exposure (EPE) is USD 10 million and expected negative exposure (ENE) is USD 6 million, both constant over a 2-year life, with zero discounting. The client's cumulative default probability over 2 years is 4% and the bank's is 2%. Both recovery rates are 40%, and exposure is independent of default. Ignoring joint default effects, what is the approximate bilateral CVA (net charge)?
The bilateral CVA is about USD 0.168 million. Unilateral CVA is 10 million x 4% x 60% = 0.24 million, DVA is 6 million x 2% x 60% = 0.072 million, and the net charge is their difference.
- AUSD 0.12 millionCorrect
- BUSD 0.168 million
- CUSD 0.240 million
- DUSD 0.072 million
Explanation
CVA = 10 x 4% x 60% = 0.24 million. DVA = 6 x 2% x 60% = 0.072 million. Bilateral = 0.24 - 0.072 = 0.168 million. So the net charge is USD 0.168 million. The 0.12 option wrongly mixes the figures and 0.24 ignores DVA.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Credit Value Adjustment shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Credit Value Adjustment questions
- A bank has an interest rate swap in which it receives fixed from a counterparty. Assume the counterparty is the only defaultable party. How …
- A bank has an uncollateralised derivative portfolio with a corporate client. The bank calculates unilateral CVA from its own perspective. Wh…
- A bank has an uncollateralised OTC derivative portfolio with a counterparty. Under the standard unilateral CVA approach, which expression be…
- A bank's derivative book with a counterparty has a unilateral CVA of USD 2.40 million (loss from counterparty default) and a DVA of USD 0.90…
- Independence-based CVA uses discounted expected exposure of 4.0 million in the period, default probability 2.0% and loss given default 60%, …
- A bank wants to incorporate wrong-way risk into its CVA calculation using a simple, commonly used approach that avoids full joint modelling …