Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Governance

A bank's board risk committee receives a quarterly credit report. Which of the following reporting features would best support effective board oversight of credit risk?

The board should receive concise, forward-looking information measured against risk appetite: limit breaches, concentrations, rating migration, stress test outcomes and policy exceptions. Granular loan lists overwhelm directors, and aggregate provisions or old audit findings fail to reveal the evolving risk profile.

  1. ADetailed loan-by-loan listings of every performing exposure
  2. BOnly the aggregate provision amount and total loans outstanding
  3. CForward-looking metrics against appetite, including limit breaches, concentrations, migration trends, stress test results, and exceptions to policyCorrect
  4. DA summary of audit findings from prior years only

Explanation

Boards need concise, forward-looking information tied to appetite: breaches, concentrations, rating migration, stress results and policy exceptions. Loan-level detail overwhelms, aggregates alone hide risk, and historical audit findings are not a risk profile.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Governance shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Governance questions