Skip to content

FRM Part I · FRM Exam Part I · Enterprise Risk Management and Future Trends

A bank's board wants to translate its overall willingness to take risk into a form that business-line managers can use in daily decisions. Which of the following is the most appropriate way to do this within an enterprise risk management framework?

Risk appetite should be cascaded into measurable limits and tolerances for each business line and risk type. This turns the board's high-level statement into operational constraints that can be monitored and enforced. Independent interpretation or purely qualitative guidance leads to inconsistent risk taking and weak accountability across the firm.

  1. ASet a single group-wide risk appetite statement and leave each business line to interpret it independently
  2. BCascade the risk appetite statement into measurable risk limits and tolerances for each business line and risk typeCorrect
  3. CReplace quantitative limits with qualitative guidance so that managers retain full discretion
  4. DSet limits only at the level of the board and avoid specifying limits below that level

Explanation

Risk appetite is an expression of the aggregate risk the firm is willing to accept. To be operational it must be cascaded into specific, measurable limits and tolerances for business lines and risk types. Leaving interpretation to each unit leads to inconsistent risk taking and weak accountability.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Enterprise Risk Management and Future Trends shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

Practise Enterprise Risk Management and Future TrendsFree diagnostic mock

More Enterprise Risk Management and Future Trends questions