FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Capital Planning at Large Bank Holding Companies: Supervisory Expectations and Range of Current Practice
A bank's CCAR capital plan shows strong post-stress ratios, but supervisors object to the submission. The review finds that the stress loss estimates rely on a vendor model that the bank has never validated, the planning assumptions were approved only by the treasury function, and the board received only a summary slide. Which single remedy best addresses the root supervisory concern across these findings?
The best remedy is to strengthen governance and internal controls, including independent validation of models and real board review and challenge of the capital plan. The findings, an unvalidated vendor model, narrow approval and a summary-only board briefing, are all governance weaknesses that supervisors expect to be addressed.
- AIncrease the planned dividend to reflect the strong ratios
- BStrengthen governance and internal controls, including independent model validation and substantive board review and challenge of the capital planCorrect
- CReplace internal estimates entirely with the supervisor's published loss rates
- DShorten the planning horizon to reduce estimation uncertainty
Explanation
The findings are all governance and control weaknesses: unvalidated models, narrow approval, and superficial board involvement. Supervisory expectations stress board-level review, independent validation and robust internal controls. Raising dividends worsens the situation, supervisory loss rates do not replace internal processes, and shortening the horizon does not fix governance.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Capital Planning at Large Bank Holding Companies: Supervisory Expectations and Range of Current Practice shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Capital Planning at Large Bank Holding Companies: Supervisory Expectations and Range of Current Practice questions
- Internal audit at a large bank holding company reviews the capital planning process. Which finding would most clearly indicate a weakness in…
- A bank holding company's stress test shows its minimum projected CET1 ratio is 5.0% in quarter 6 of the planning horizon, against a 4.5% min…
- A bank's capital plan shows its stressed minimum CET1 ratio falls to 6.5% in quarter 7. Its internal policy sets a trigger at 7.0% and the r…
- A bank's stress test shows a minimum post-stress Tier 1 common ratio of 7.0% against an internal target of 6.0%. Supervisors note the bank a…
- A BHC projects over the stress horizon: starting CET1 capital of $50 billion, risk-weighted assets (RWA) of $500 billion, cumulative pre-pro…
- Which practice best reflects strong governance over a large BHC's stress testing used for capital planning?