Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Guidance on Managing Outsourcing Risk

A bank's outsourcing register shows 40 material arrangements. Senior management reports to the board that all 40 have signed contracts, but the report contains no information on provider performance, incidents, exit plans or concentration. A non-executive director asks what is the main deficiency in the reporting. Which response is best?

The report is deficient because it only proves contracts exist. The board needs ongoing information on provider performance, incidents, concentration and exit readiness to oversee outsourcing risk. Without it, directors cannot judge whether exposures remain within appetite or discharge their accountability.

  1. AThe report is adequate because contracts transfer risk to providers
  2. BThe report shows legal completeness but gives the board no ongoing view of risk exposure, so it cannot fulfil its oversight dutyCorrect
  3. CThe report should be replaced with a single annual attestation from each provider
  4. DThe report should be sent to the regulator instead of the board

Explanation

Boards need regular, risk-focused information such as performance against service levels, incidents, concentration and the readiness of exit strategies. Contract existence alone does not show how risk is evolving. Provider attestations lack independence, and regulator reporting does not replace board oversight.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Guidance on Managing Outsourcing Risk shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Guidance on Managing Outsourcing Risk questions