FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Credit Scoring and Retail Credit Risk Management
A bank's retail portfolio has an expected default rate of 2% in normal conditions. Using a one-factor Gaussian copula framework, the 99.9% worst-case default rate is 9%. The portfolio has 10,000 loans of 10,000 each, LGD is 50%. Unexpected loss at the 99.9% level, defined as worst-case loss less expected loss, is closest to:
Unexpected loss is about 3.5 million. Worst-case loss is 100 million times 9% times 50%, or 4.5 million; expected loss is 1.0 million; the difference is 3.5 million. Reporting 4.5 million would forget to deduct expected loss.
- A3,500,000Correct
- B4,500,000
- C7,000,000
- D9,000,000
Explanation
Exposure = 100,000,000. Worst-case loss = 100m x 9% x 50% = 4.5m. EL = 100m x 2% x 50% = 1.0m. UL = 3.5m. Choosing 4.5m ignores subtracting EL; 7m and 9m ignore LGD or use wrong differences.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Credit Scoring and Retail Credit Risk Management shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Credit Scoring and Retail Credit Risk Management questions
- A card issuer finds that its scorecard, built three years ago, still ranks customers well (stable Gini) but the observed default rate in the…
- A card issuer notices that customers who recently had their credit lines increased through an automated program show a higher subsequent def…
- A lender rejects a loan applicant using an automated scoring model. Under typical adverse action and consumer protection requirements, which…
- A bank holds 10,000 identical unsecured personal loans of 5,000 each. Each has a one-year PD of 3%, LGD of 70%, and defaults are independent…
- A lender's mortgage scorecard assigns a 12-month PD of 2.0% to a score band. Over the past year 2,000 loans were in that band and 60 default…
- A bank's unsecured personal loan portfolio shows a 12-month vintage analysis. The 2023 vintage has a cumulative 90+ day delinquency rate of …