Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Liquidity Risk

A bank's treasurer is drafting the liquidity stress testing framework. Which design choice best reflects sound practice for the scenarios used?

Good practice uses several scenarios covering idiosyncratic, market-wide and combined shocks, with varying severity and duration. History alone or a single short shock leaves gaps, and off-balance-sheet commitments must be included because they can draw down in stress and drain liquidity.

  1. AUse only historical bank-specific events, since hypothetical scenarios cannot be calibrated
  2. BCombine idiosyncratic and market-wide shocks, including a combined scenario, and vary severity and durationCorrect
  3. CUse a single severe market-wide scenario lasting one day, to keep results comparable over time
  4. DExclude contingent off-balance-sheet exposures because they are not currently on the balance sheet

Explanation

Sound liquidity stress testing uses multiple scenarios: idiosyncratic, market-wide and combined, at varying severity and horizons. Relying only on history or a single one-day shock misses plausible vulnerabilities. Contingent exposures such as committed facilities can draw down under stress and must be included.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Liquidity Risk shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Liquidity Risk questions