FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Risk Management for Changing Interest Rates: Asset-Liability Management and Duration Techniques
A bond portfolio worth 100 million has modified duration 6.0 and convexity 50. Yields rise by 100 bps in parallel. Using duration plus convexity, the estimated change in value is closest to:
The estimated change is about -5.75 million. Duration gives -6.0% and the convexity adjustment adds 0.5 times 50 times 0.0001, or 0.25%, producing -5.75% on 100 million. Ignoring convexity would give -6.00 million.
- A-6.00 million
- B-5.75 millionCorrect
- C-6.25 million
- D-5.50 million
Explanation
Percentage change = -6.0*0.01 + 0.5*50*(0.01)^2 = -0.06 + 0.0025 = -0.0575. On 100 million this is -5.75 million. Option A omits the convexity term; option C subtracts it instead of adding.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Risk Management for Changing Interest Rates: Asset-Liability Management and Duration Techniques shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Risk Management for Changing Interest Rates: Asset-Liability Management and Duration Techniques questions
- A portfolio manager holds a USD 100m liability due in 10 years and funds it with a barbell of 2-year and 30-year zero-coupon bonds, matching…
- A bank's treasury wants to immunize equity against parallel rate shifts. Assets are USD 800 million with a modified duration of 3.0. Liabili…
- A bank has assets of 1,000 with duration 3.0 and liabilities of 900 with duration 3.0. Equity is 100. A risk manager says the bank is immuni…
- A risk manager wants to capture exposure to non-parallel yield curve movements that single-number duration misses. Which approach is most ap…
- A bank has total assets of $1,000 million with a modified duration of 4.0 years and total liabilities of $900 million with a modified durati…
- Which limitation most directly reduces the reliability of a duration gap measure of economic value of equity sensitivity for a bank with lar…