CS Professional · Drafting, Pleadings and Appearances · Adjudications and Appeals under SEBI Laws
A broker is aggrieved by a SEBI order made in 2018, against which SAT has already ruled. Which route is available for the next appeal under the SEBI Act, 1992, as currently in force?
The next appeal lies to the Supreme Court under Section 15Z, limited to a question of law arising out of the SAT order. Section 20 covers only Board orders made before the 1999 amendment, and Section 26B deals with trial of offences, not appeals.
- AAn appeal to the Central Government under Section 20 within the prescribed time
- BAn appeal to the Supreme Court under Section 15Z on a question of law arising out of the SAT orderCorrect
- CA trial before a Special Court under Section 26B
- DA review by SEBI's own Board as the only remedy
Explanation
After SAT decides, the further appeal lies to the Supreme Court under Section 15Z on a question of law. Section 20 now applies only to Board orders made before the 1999 Amendment Act commenced. Section 26B concerns trial of offences by Special Courts, not appeals from SAT.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Adjudications and Appeals under SEBI Laws shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Adjudications and Appeals under SEBI Laws questions
- A recognised stock exchange refused to list the securities of Sagar Infra Ltd and furnished its reasons on 10 June. Under section 22A of the…
- Pranav Depository Participants Pvt Ltd is aggrieved by a SAT order passed under the Depositories Act, 1996. It receives communication of the…
- Meridian Securities Ltd. receives a copy of an order of the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) on 10 March. It wants to challenge the order…
- During an appeal by Deshmukh Investments against an adjudicating officer's order under the SCRA, 1956, SAT wishes to have a witness examined…
- A depository's draft bye-laws, adopted without SEBI's approval, are challenged. Later SEBI, finding a bye-law inadequate, orders the deposit…
- Ketan Rao is being prosecuted before a Special Court established under the SEBI Act, 1992 for a securities offence. His counsel argues that …