CS Professional · Drafting, Pleadings and Appearances · Pleadings
A civil court in Nagpur, with pecuniary jurisdiction up to Rs 2,00,000, finds a claim by Kavita false and vexatious after the objector raised the objection, and the claim was withdrawn. Applying Section 35A(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 as printed, what is the maximum compensatory costs it can award (no High Court limit applies)?
The maximum is Rs 3,000. Section 35A(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 caps compensatory costs at three thousand rupees or the court's pecuniary jurisdiction, whichever is less, and Rs 3,000 is far below the court's Rs 2,00,000 limit.
- ARs 2,00,000, being its pecuniary limit
- BRs 3,000, being the lesser of the cap and its pecuniary limitCorrect
- CRs 1,000, the original cap
- DRs 250
Explanation
Section 35A(2) bars an amount exceeding three thousand rupees or exceeding the court's pecuniary jurisdiction, whichever is less. Between Rs 3,000 and Rs 2,00,000 the lesser is Rs 3,000. Rs 1,000 was the earlier cap, replaced by the 1976 amendment.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Pleadings shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Pleadings questions
- Meera Traders Pvt Ltd, Mumbai, is sued in a civil suit for recovery. It objects that the plaintiff's claim is false to the plaintiff's knowl…
- Mehta Traders sued Kapoor Steels in a civil court for recovery of Rs 8 lakh. Kapoor Steels filed its written statement and wants to claim th…
- The Central Government appoints Mr. Sen under Section 85 to defend a suit on behalf of a foreign Ruler. Applications under the Code in that …
- Meera Shah drafts a bail application and wants to include a prayer for compensatory costs against the complainant for a false defence, relyi…
- Sanjay, a Company Secretary in Delhi, is advising on a petition to quash an FIR before the High Court. He is asked whether the Code of Civil…
- In a suit before a court (outside J&K and Ladakh) the Court finds a defence false and vexatious under Section 35A. The Court's pecuniary jur…