IAI Actuarial Core Principles · Actuarial Mathematics for Modelling · Duration, convexity and immunisation
A company must pay Rs 1,000,000 in 6 years. It plans to hold two zero-coupon bonds, maturing in 3 years and 9 years, with present values equal in total to the liability PV, to satisfy the first Redington condition and match duration. The yield is 5%. What proportion of the total present value must be placed in the 3-year bond?
Half of the present value, 0.50, goes into the 3-year bond. Zero-coupon discounted mean terms equal their maturities, so 3w + 9(1−w) = 6 gives w = 0.5. The spread of the 3 and 9 year terms also ensures asset convexity exceeds liability convexity.
- A0.25
- B0.50Correct
- C0.75
- D0.33
- 0.67
Explanation
Matching mean term: w×3 + (1−w)×9 = 6, so 9 − 6w = 6 and w = 0.5. The yield does not alter this because zero-coupon bonds have discounted mean term equal to maturity. Convexity of assets then exceeds liabilities since 3 and 9 are spread around 6.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Duration, convexity and immunisation shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Duration, convexity and immunisation questions
- Two portfolios have the same present value and the same discounted mean term. Portfolio P has cashflows concentrated near its mean term, and…
- A zero-coupon bond pays a single sum on redemption exactly 8 years from now. Whatever the effective annual interest rate used to value it, w…
- A pension fund has a single liability of Rs 10,000 due in 10 years. The effective annual interest rate is 5%. It will immunise using two zer…
- A single payment of Rs 50,000 is due in exactly 7 years, and the valuation rate is 8% per annum effective. What is the discounted mean term …
- Which statement about convexity in the context of Redington immunisation is correct?
- Under Redington's theory of immunisation, which of the following sets correctly states the conditions that must hold at the current valuatio…