IAI Actuarial Core Principles · Business Finance · Capital structure and dividend policy
A company raises extra debt while keeping its business risk unchanged. Under the Modigliani-Miller propositions with corporate tax, what is the effect on WACC as gearing increases?
With corporate tax, WACC falls as gearing increases. Interest is tax deductible, so the tax shield makes debt cheaper, and the higher cost of equity does not fully offset this benefit under the Modigliani-Miller model with tax.
- AWACC rises because equity holders demand more return
- BWACC is unchanged because of the tax shield being offset
- CWACC falls because of the tax shield on interestCorrect
- DWACC rises because debt is riskier than equity
- WACC is independent of tax
Explanation
With corporate tax, interest is deductible, creating a tax shield. Although the cost of equity rises with gearing, it does not fully offset the cheaper after-tax debt, so WACC falls as gearing rises.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Capital structure and dividend policy shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Capital structure and dividend policy questions
- Which of the following is the main reason the trade-off theory predicts a finite optimal level of gearing for a company?
- According to the traditional view of capital structure, how does a company's weighted average cost of capital (WACC) behave as gearing rises…
- Which argument is the central claim of the 'bird in the hand' theory of dividends associated with Gordon and Lintner?
- Which statement best describes the 'bird in the hand' argument associated with Gordon and Lintner?
- Which statement best describes a scrip (stock) dividend offered by a company to its shareholders?
- Rohan Textiles has an unlevered cost of equity of 15%, and the corporate tax rate is 30%. It holds permanent debt at a market D/E of 0.4 wit…