IAI Actuarial Core Principles · Economic Modelling · Ruin theory
A company's surplus follows a compound Poisson process with adjustment coefficient R = 0.0005 per rupee. Its initial surplus is ₹6,000. By Lundberg's inequality, which is the best upper bound for the probability of ultimate ruin?
The bound is ψ(u) ≤ e^{−Ru} = e^{−0.0005×6000} = e^{−3} ≈ 0.0498, so ruin probability is at most about 5%.
- Ae^{-0.3}≈0.741
- Be^{-3}≈0.0498Correct
- Ce^{-6}≈0.0025
- De^{-30}
- 0.0005
Explanation
Lundberg's inequality gives ψ(u) ≤ e^{-Ru}. Here Ru = 0.0005×6,000 = 3, so the bound is e^{-3} ≈ 0.0498. The option e^{-0.3} arises from a decimal slip.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Ruin theory shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Ruin theory questions
- In the classical compound Poisson surplus process U(t) = u + ct − S(t), which statement about the premium loading condition is correct for r…
- In a compound Poisson surplus process, claims are exponential with mean 1,000 rupees and arrive at rate λ = 5 per year. Premiums are receive…
- A general insurer's claims follow a compound Poisson process with Poisson rate λ = 10 per year and mean claim size Rs 2 lakh. Premiums are r…
- A company's aggregate claims follow a compound Poisson process with λ = 2 per year. Each claim is ₹1 lakh with probability 0.5 and ₹2 lakh w…
- An insurer's surplus follows a compound Poisson model with claim size distribution exponential with mean 1,000 (rupees) and premium loading …
- Annual aggregate claims are i.i.d. with mean Rs 90 lakh and standard deviation Rs 30 lakh. Annual premium is Rs 100 lakh, initial surplus Rs…