FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Arbitrage Pricing with Term Structure Models
A desk calibrates a Ho-Lee model with σ = 1.0% per year. Using the standard result that the convexity effect lowers the zero-coupon bond yield by σ²T²/6 in the Ho-Lee model's continuously compounded yield relative to the expected-rate path, what is the approximate convexity term for T = 10 years?
The convexity term is σ²T²/6 = 0.0001 × 100 / 6 ≈ 0.001667, or about 16.7 basis points. It grows with the square of maturity, so it matters far more for long-dated zero-coupon bonds than for short ones.
- A0.1667% (about 16.7 bp)Correct
- B1.67%
- C0.0167% (about 1.7 bp)
- D0.6000%
Explanation
σ²T²/6 = (0.01)² × 100 / 6 = 0.01/6 = 0.001667, i.e. 0.1667% or about 16.7 bp. Using T instead of T² gives 1.7 bp; omitting the division by 6 gives 1%.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Arbitrage Pricing with Term Structure Models shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Arbitrage Pricing with Term Structure Models questions
- A risk analyst uses a one-period-recombining binomial tree for the annualised one-year rate. The current one-year rate is 4.00%. After one y…
- In a binomial short-rate tree used for pricing, why is the value of a bond at an earlier node computed by backward induction using risk-neut…
- In a risk-neutral binomial tree calibrated to today's zero-coupon curve, a risk manager notices that the model price of a 2-period bond is h…
- A stock trades at 100. After one year it will be either 110 or 90. The one-year risk-free rate is 5% with annual compounding. A one-year Eur…
- A risk manager compares the long-horizon rate volatility in Ho-Lee (σ = 1.00%) and Vasicek (σ = 1.00%, k = 0.50). As the horizon T becomes v…
- A bank values a two-year bond with a face value of 100 that pays a 5 coupon at year 1 and 105 at year 2. The issuer may call the bond at yea…