FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Backtesting VaR
A desk's 99% one-day VaR is backtested over 250 days with 5 exceptions observed. Using the binomial distribution with p = 1%, which statement about the test is most accurate? (Approximate P(X>=5) is about 10.8%; P(X>=6) is about 4.2%.)
Fail to reject. The probability of seeing 5 or more exceptions when 2.5 are expected is about 10.8%, above the 5% threshold. The 4.2% figure applies to 6 exceptions. Because power is low with so few expected exceptions, the model may still be flawed.
- AReject at the 5% one-tailed level because 5 exceeds the expected 2.5
- BFail to reject at 5% one-tailed because P(X>=5) of about 10.8% exceeds 5%, though the Type II error risk remainsCorrect
- CReject, because the p-value of 4.2% applies to 5 exceptions
- DFail to reject because the Type I error rate equals 10.8%, which is acceptable
Explanation
The one-tailed p-value for observing 5 or more exceptions is about 10.8%, above 5%, so the model is not rejected. The 4.2% figure belongs to 6 exceptions. Not rejecting does not prove accuracy, as the test has limited power with few exceptions, so Type II error is a concern.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Backtesting VaR shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Backtesting VaR questions
- A bank's 99% one-day VaR model is backtested over 250 trading days and produces 1 exception. The head of risk argues that this proves the mo…
- Which limitation of the Christoffersen independence test, as typically specified, is most accurate?
- A bank backtests a 99% one-day VaR over 500 days and observes 12 exceptions. The expected number is 5. A review finds that the model assumes…
- A bank backtests a 95% one-day VaR over 500 days and observes 40 exceptions. The Kupiec likelihood ratio statistic is LR = -2 ln[(0.95)^460 …
- A bank uses a 99% one-day VaR model and tests it with a two-sided binomial test at the 5% significance level over a long sample. The model p…
- A risk analyst evaluates a bank's 99% VaR model with 250 observations. Assume the model is correct, so exceptions are binomial with p = 1%. …