FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · VaR and Risk Budgeting in Investment Management
A fund has two managers. Manager A has a tracking error of 3% and Manager B has a tracking error of 4%. Their active returns are uncorrelated, and the sponsor allocates 50% of capital to each. What is the approximate total tracking error of the combined active portfolio?
The combined tracking error is 2.5%. With uncorrelated active returns and 50% weights, variance is 2.25 plus 4, or 6.25, and its square root is 2.5%. Averaging the two tracking errors to 3.5% wrongly ignores the diversification benefit.
- A2.50%Correct
- B3.50%
- C1.75%
- D5.00%
Explanation
Weighted variance = (0.5×3)² + (0.5×4)² = 2.25 + 4 = 6.25, so TE = 2.5%. A simple weighted average gives 3.5%, which ignores diversification from zero correlation. The sum of 7% scaled wrongly or 5% from the root of 9+16 ignores the weights.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on VaR and Risk Budgeting in Investment Management shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More VaR and Risk Budgeting in Investment Management questions
- A manager has IR of 0.80 and runs a portfolio with targeted active risk (tracking error) of 5%. Using the standard relationship between IR, …
- A pension fund manager reports that a portfolio's 95% one-month absolute VaR is USD 12 million, while its 95% one-month relative VaR against…
- A manager's IC is 0.05 with 100 independent bets, giving IR of 0.50. The manager redesigns the process so that the same forecasts are now sp…
- A pension plan allocates capital to several external managers and sets a separate tracking-error budget for each. Which statement best descr…
- A portfolio has annual volatility of 12% and its benchmark has annual volatility of 10%. The correlation between portfolio and benchmark ret…
- A sponsor's total fund has a portfolio standard deviation of 10%. Managers X and Y have weights of 60% and 40%. Their marginal contributions…