CS Executive · Jurisprudence, Interpretation and General Laws · Sources of Law
A High Court judge, while deciding a dispute, relies on a standard textbook by a renowned jurist to understand an unsettled principle, though the book is not binding. In Salmond's scheme, the textbook is best classified as:
The textbook is a historical source of law. It has no binding authority on courts and merely influences how law develops, whereas legal sources such as statutes and precedents are directly recognised and enforced by courts.
- AA historical source of lawCorrect
- BA legal source of law
- CA formal source of law
- DA statutory source of law
Explanation
A textbook has no binding authority, so it is not a legal or formal source. It influences the development of law only indirectly and is therefore a historical source. A distractor treating it as a legal source wrongly assumes courts must follow it.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Sources of Law shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Sources of Law questions
- In jurisprudence, the sources of law are commonly divided into two broad classes. Which pair correctly names this classification?
- In India, courts sometimes decide cases on 'justice, equity and good conscience' where no specific statute or established rule applies. Whic…
- A State Legislature enacts a law on a subject in the Concurrent List. Parliament has earlier enacted a law on the same subject, and the two …
- Under the Indian legal system, which of the following is the correct description of 'subordinate (delegated) legislation'?
- Salmond's view on sources of law distinguishes legal sources from historical sources. Which statement reflects this distinction correctly?
- A trade association's members adopt a model code of conduct by mutual consent, which each member signs. Which feature distinguishes this cod…