Skip to content

IAI Actuarial Core Principles · Business Economics · Pricing strategies in the financial services sector

A life insurer offers a term plan at a lower premium to non-smokers and a higher premium to smokers. From an economics viewpoint, which statement best describes this practice?

This is third-degree price discrimination, because customers are split into observable groups and charged different prices. In insurance the gap also mirrors different expected claim costs, so it is risk-based segmentation rather than purely capturing consumer surplus.

  1. APerfect first-degree price discrimination, since each customer pays their own reservation price
  2. BThird-degree price discrimination based on observable group characteristics, which also reflects differences in costCorrect
  3. CSecond-degree discrimination, where customers self-select through quantity discounts
  4. DPredatory pricing aimed at excluding rival insurers
  5. Peak-load pricing based on time of purchase

Explanation

Charging distinct groups different prices based on an observable trait is third-degree discrimination. Here the difference mainly reflects expected claim costs, so it is risk-based pricing rather than pure exploitation of willingness to pay. First-degree would need individual reservation prices, and second-degree relies on self-selection.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Pricing strategies in the financial services sector shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Pricing strategies in the financial services sector questions