NISM Certifications · NISM-Series-V-A: Mutual Fund Distributors · Risk, Return and Performance of Funds
A mutual fund scheme's returns have a standard deviation of 18% per annum, while its benchmark index has a standard deviation of 15%. What does this primarily indicate about the scheme?
The scheme has shown higher volatility than its benchmark, because standard deviation measures how widely returns vary around their average. A figure of 18% against 15% means greater dispersion of returns, not necessarily higher returns or a specific beta.
- AThe scheme has shown higher volatility of returns than the benchmarkCorrect
- BThe scheme has given higher returns than the benchmark
- CThe scheme has lower risk than the benchmark
- DThe scheme has a beta of exactly 1.2
Explanation
Standard deviation measures the dispersion of returns around their average, so it is a measure of total volatility. A higher figure (18% vs 15%) means more volatility. It says nothing directly about the level of return, and beta is a different measure based on covariance with the market.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Risk, Return and Performance of Funds shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Risk, Return and Performance of Funds questions
- Fund A and Fund B both have a Treynor-based comparison over the same period. Fund A: return 15%, beta 1.5; Fund B: return 12%, beta 0.8. The…
- A scheme earned a return of 12% over a year while its risk-free rate was 6% and its standard deviation was 10%. What is its Sharpe ratio?
- A fund earned a return of 14% in a year. The risk-free rate is 6%, the fund's standard deviation is 16% and its beta is 0.8. What is the fun…
- A scheme has a beta of 1.2 relative to its benchmark. If the benchmark rises by 10%, what is the scheme's expected movement, all else equal?
- Fund A has a standard deviation of 18% and Fund B has a standard deviation of 12%, both over the same period and with similar objectives. Wh…
- A scheme has a beta of 1.2. If the market index falls by 10%, what fall would be expected in the scheme's value, based on beta alone?