CS Executive · Jurisprudence, Interpretation and General Laws · Law relating to Civil Procedure
A pre-1908 notification refers to Act VIII of 1859, the earlier Code of Civil Procedure. How is that reference to be read after the commencement of the Code of 1908?
The reference is treated, so far as practicable, as a reference to the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 or its corresponding Part, Order, section or rule, under Section 158, rather than becoming void.
- AAs a reference to the Code of 1908 or its corresponding Part, Order, section or rule, so far as practicableCorrect
- BAs a reference that becomes void and unenforceable
- CAs a reference to the Limitation Act only
- DAs a reference that must be read only with the First Schedule
Explanation
Section 158 provides that references in earlier enactments or notifications to Act VIII of 1859 or any repealed Code of Civil Procedure are, so far as practicable, deemed to refer to the 1908 Code or its corresponding Part, Order, section or rule. The void option ignores this saving.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Law relating to Civil Procedure shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Law relating to Civil Procedure questions
- Rohan sues Meera over a farm plot. It is genuinely uncertain whether the plot lies within the local limits of Court A or Court B. Court A is…
- A High Court wishes to frame rules for its own procedure in the exercise of its original civil jurisdiction. Which statement correctly refle…
- A suit about immovable property was decided by a court whose territorial jurisdiction over the property was doubtful. No statement about unc…
- Under the Code, to which matters do the provisions relating to appeals from original decrees apply, so far as may be?
- Under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, how do the provisions on execution of decrees apply to orders passed by a court?
- Under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, which Court may a person aggrieved by a decree or order apply to for a review of judgment?