CS Executive · Economic, Commercial and Intellectual Property Laws · Law relating to Geographical Indications of Goods
A producers' association applies to register the name "Silkara" for handloom sarees from a district in Odisha. A name "Silkara" is already registered for sarees from a village in Assam. The Registrar must decide whether the second registration can be allowed. Under the GI Act, 1999, what is the governing position?
A homonymous geographical indication can be registered if the Registrar is satisfied, after weighing how the indications will be differentiated in practice and the need for equitable treatment of producers, that consumers will not be confused or misled. It is neither barred outright nor automatic.
- AA homonymous GI may be registered if the Registrar is satisfied that consumers will not be confused or misled, after considering how the indications will be differentiated and the equitable treatment of producersCorrect
- BA homonymous GI can never be registered because an identical name is already on the register
- CA homonymous GI can be registered automatically once the applicant pays the prescribed fee
- DA homonymous GI can be registered only if the earlier registrant gives written consent to the Registrar
Explanation
Section 10 permits registration of a homonymous GI, subject to section 7, if the Registrar is satisfied, after considering practical conditions of differentiation and equitable treatment of producers, that consumers will not be confused or misled. A flat bar on identical names is wrong, and neither fee payment nor consent is the stated test.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Law relating to Geographical Indications of Goods shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Law relating to Geographical Indications of Goods questions
- A registered proprietor of a GI for a craft sues in a district court. Which statement about where a suit for infringement may be filed is co…
- A prosecution is pending against Rohan under the Act for an offence relating to a registered geographical indication. Rohan pleads that the …
- A wine maker from a notified convention country has used a GI identifying its wines continuously in its own country for over ten years befor…
- In a rectification matter before the High Court, the Registrar chooses not to appear in person. Unless the High Court otherwise directs, wha…
- Section 2(1)(c) of the GI Act, 1999 defines when one geographical indication is deceptively similar to another. Which test does it apply?
- Anand, a wholesaler in Pune, lawfully buys sealed packs of a GI-registered tea from the authorised user, repackages them into smaller retail…