CS Executive · Setting Up of Business, Industrial and Labour Laws · The Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act
A production house wishes to cast 10-year-old Aarav as an actor in a television serial. Which statement is correct under Section 3 of the Act?
It is allowed, but only as artist work under Section 3(2)(b), subject to prescribed conditions and safety measures, and it must not affect the child's school education. The exception covers television serials, films and advertisements, but excludes the circus.
- AIt is absolutely prohibited, as no exception exists for children
- BIt is allowed as artist work in audio-visual entertainment, subject to prescribed conditions and safety measures, provided it does not affect his school educationCorrect
- CIt is allowed without any conditions because acting is a hobby
- DIt is allowed only if the serial is circus-based
Explanation
Section 3(2)(b) permits a child to work as an artist in audio-visual entertainment, including advertisements, films and television serials, subject to prescribed conditions and safety measures. The proviso says such work must not affect school education. Circus is specifically excluded, and the exception is not free of conditions.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on The Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More The Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act questions
- Under the Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986, the appropriate Government must constitute the Child and Adole…
- Under the definitions in the Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986, who is the 'appropriate Government' for a m…
- Mehta Garments, a Surat firm, employs a child in contravention of section 3 of the Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) …
- A ministry notifies that certain non-hazardous work may be done by adolescents. Which statement correctly reflects the Act's provision on th…
- A parent, Sunita, was earlier convicted for permitting her child to work in contravention of section 3. She commits a like offence again. Wh…
- Ravi, a first-time offender, was convicted of employing a child in contravention of section 3. Years later he again employs a child in the s…