FRM Part I · FRM Exam Part I · Hypothesis Testing
A regulator applies a one-tailed test to a 99% VaR model, where too many exceptions indicate underestimated risk. Which statement about the test is correct?
A Type I error means rejecting an accurate model, wrongly penalizing the bank. The null hypothesis is that the model is correct, so rejecting it when true is Type I. Failing to reject only shows insufficient evidence against the model, not proof of accuracy.
- AThe null hypothesis is that the exception probability exceeds 1%
- BFailing to reject the null proves the model is accurate
- CA Type I error means rejecting an accurate model, which wrongly penalizes the bankCorrect
- DA Type II error means rejecting an accurate model
Explanation
The null is that the model is correct (exception probability of 1%). A Type I error is rejecting a true null, meaning an accurate model is wrongly rejected. A Type II error is failing to reject a flawed model. Failing to reject does not prove accuracy; it only shows insufficient evidence.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Hypothesis Testing shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Hypothesis Testing questions
- A portfolio's return distribution is unknown, with mean 0 and standard deviation 4%. Using Chebyshev's inequality, what is the minimum proba…
- Which statement about chi-square and F tests for variances is correct?
- An analyst tests H0: mu = 0 against H1: mu ≠ 0 for the mean daily excess return of a fund and obtains a two-sided p-value of 0.034. Which co…
- A bank backtests a 99% one-day VaR model over 250 trading days and observes 6 exceptions. Assuming exceptions are independent Bernoulli even…
- A risk manager tests whether the mean daily P&L of a desk differs from zero using 400 observations. The sample mean is 0.08 (in $ thousand) …
- A risk manager tests whether a trading desk's mean daily P&L is zero using a two-sided z-test. The test statistic is 1.75. Using the standar…