Skip to content

FRM Part I · FRM Exam Part I · Fund Management

A researcher builds a hedge fund performance database from a commercial vendor in which funds report voluntarily. Funds that liquidate after poor results stop reporting and are removed from the historical data. Which bias does this most directly create, and in which direction does it distort average reported returns?

This is survivorship bias, and it overstates average returns. Funds that fail and stop reporting are dropped from the database, leaving only successful funds, so the historical average looks better than the true experience of all funds that were launched.

  1. ASurvivorship bias, overstating average returnsCorrect
  2. BSurvivorship bias, understating average returns
  3. CBackfill bias, understating average returns
  4. DSelection bias from market timing, understating average returns

Explanation

When failed funds disappear from the database, only survivors remain, and these have better past returns than the full population. Average returns and Sharpe ratios are therefore overstated. Backfill bias is a different issue involving the addition of past history when a fund joins.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Fund Management shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Fund Management questions